"right of proxy" vs "right to proxy"

Question

"right of proxy" vs "right to proxy"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Right of proxy' is used to refer to the authority or power given to a proxy, while 'right to proxy' is used to refer to the entitlement or permission to act as a proxy. They are not interchangeable as they convey different meanings.

Last Updated: March 25, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate the authority or power granted to a proxy to act on behalf of someone else.

Examples:

The shareholder has the right of proxy to vote on behalf of the company.
The attorney has the right of proxy to represent the client in court.

Alternatives:

proxy's right
proxy's authority

This phrase is used to indicate the entitlement or permission granted to someone to act as a proxy on behalf of another person.

Examples:

She has the right to proxy for her colleague at the meeting.
The shareholder has the right to proxy his voting rights to another person.

Alternatives:

permission to act as a proxy
entitlement to be a proxy

Answer 1

right of proxy

This phrase is correct and is commonly used in legal contexts to refer to the authority or power given to a proxy.

Answer 2

right to proxy

This phrase is correct and is commonly used to refer to the entitlement or permission to act as a proxy.

"right of proxy" vs "right to proxy"

right of proxy

right to proxy

Related Comparisons