"results of the first year" vs "results for the first year"

Question

"results of the first year" vs "results for the first year"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'Results of the first year' is commonly used when referring to outcomes or achievements related to the first year, while 'results for the first year' is more appropriate when indicating the time period for which the results are being presented.

Last Updated: March 30, 2024

This phrase is used to refer to outcomes or achievements related to the first year of a specific context.

Examples:

The results of the first year of the project were impressive.
The results of the first year of college were better than expected.

Alternatives:

outcomes of the first year
achievements in the first year
performance in the first year
progress during the first year
results from the first year

This phrase is used to indicate the time period for which the results are being presented, typically referring to the first year of a specific context.

Examples:

Here are the results for the first year of our study.
The company will announce the financial results for the first year next week.

Alternatives:

results pertaining to the first year
results covering the first year
results related to the first year
results concerning the first year
results associated with the first year

Answer 1

results of the first year

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

results for the first year

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"results of the first year" vs "results for the first year"

results of the first year

results for the first year

Related Comparisons