"restriction on" vs "restriction to"

Question

"restriction on" vs "restriction to"

Both 'restriction to' and 'restriction on' are correct and commonly used in English, but they are used in different contexts. 'Restriction to' is used to indicate the limited scope or range of something, while 'restriction on' is used to indicate the limitation or control placed on something.

Last Updated: March 26, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate the limitation or control placed on something. It implies that something is subject to certain rules or regulations.

Examples:

There is a restriction on the use of mobile phones in the library.
The company imposed a restriction on overtime work.
The new law places restrictions on smoking in public places.

Alternatives:

limitation on
control on
regulation on

This phrase is used to indicate the limited scope or range of something. It implies that something is confined or limited to a specific set of options or choices.

Examples:

The invitation is restricted to VIP guests only.
Access to the building is restricted to authorized personnel.
The event is restricted to participants aged 18 and above.

Alternatives:

limited to
confined to
restricted to

Answer 1

restriction on

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

restriction to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"restriction on" vs "restriction to"

restriction on

restriction to

Related Comparisons