"restriction of" vs "restriction to"

Question

"restriction of" vs "restriction to"

Both 'restriction to' and 'restriction of' are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Restriction to' is used to indicate limiting something to a particular group or set, while 'restriction of' is used to show the action of limiting or confining something. Therefore, the choice between the two depends on the specific meaning you want to convey.

Last Updated: March 19, 2024

Use 'restriction of' when you want to indicate the action of limiting or confining something.

Examples:

The restriction of access to the building is necessary for security reasons.
The restriction of movement in the area is due to construction work.
The restriction of funds for the project caused delays.

Alternatives:

limitation of
confinement of
constraint of

Use 'restriction to' when you want to indicate that something is limited to a particular group, set, or condition.

Examples:

The access to the building is restricted to employees only.
The event is restricted to invited guests.
The use of this software is restricted to authorized personnel.

Alternatives:

limited to
confined to
restricted to

Answer 1

restriction of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

restriction to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"restriction of" vs "restriction to"

restriction of

restriction to

Related Comparisons