1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

"replaced with" vs "had been replaced on"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Replaced with' is used to indicate the replacement of one thing with another, while 'had been replaced on' is not a common construction in English. It seems like 'had been replaced on' might be a typo or a misinterpretation of the intended meaning.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

replaced with

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate the replacement of one thing with another.

This phrase is used to show that one thing has been substituted or exchanged for another.

Examples:

  • The old carpet was replaced with a new one.
  • She replaced the broken window with a new one.
  • He replaced his old phone with a newer model.
  • The outdated software was replaced with a more advanced version.
  • The traditional method was replaced with a more efficient one.

Alternatives:

  • substituted with
  • exchanged for
  • swapped with
  • traded for
  • switched with

had been replaced on

This phrase is not a common construction in English and does not convey a clear meaning. It may be a typo or a misinterpretation of the intended expression.

Related Comparisons

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!