1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

"replaced with" vs "had been replaced in"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Replaced with' is used to indicate the replacement of one thing with another in the present or future tense. 'Had been replaced in' is used to indicate that something was replaced in the past. They are not directly comparable as they serve different grammatical functions.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

replaced with

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used to indicate the replacement of one thing with another in the present or future tense.

Examples:

  • I replaced the old battery with a new one.
  • She replaced the broken window with a new one.
  • He will replace the damaged part with a new one.

had been replaced in

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used to indicate that something was replaced in the past.

Examples:

  • The old carpet had been replaced in the living room.
  • The faulty equipment had been replaced in the factory.
  • The damaged sign had been replaced in the park.

Related Comparisons

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!