Which is correct:
"renamed to" or "renamed"?

TextRanch: The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

100% Human-Powered Editing!

renamed to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when specifying the new name that something has been changed to.

Use "renamed to" when you want to indicate the specific new name that has been given to something after a change.

Examples:

  • The file was renamed to 'report.docx'.
  • The company was renamed to 'ABC Corporation'.
  • The street was renamed to 'Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard'.
  • The product was renamed to 'SuperTech 2000'.
  • The building was renamed to 'Sunrise Tower'.

Alternatives:

  • changed to
  • rebranded as
  • converted to
  • transformed into
  • switched to

renamed

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when stating that something has been given a new name without specifying the new name.

Use "renamed" when you want to mention that something has been given a new name without providing the specific new name.

Examples:

  • The company was renamed.
  • The street was renamed.
  • The product was renamed.
  • The building was renamed.
  • The file was renamed.

Alternatives:

  • given a new name
  • rechristened
  • rebranded
  • changed the name of
  • assigned a new name
Both "renamed to" and "renamed" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Renamed to" is used when specifying the new name that something has been changed to, while "renamed" is used when simply stating that something has been given a new name.

Last updated: March 27, 2024

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!