"relocated to the south" vs "relocated to south"

Question

"relocated to the south" vs "relocated to south"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Relocated to the south" is the more common and natural way to express this idea, indicating a specific direction or region. On the other hand, "relocated to south" could be used in a more informal or poetic context, where 'south' is being treated as a destination or concept rather than a specific location.

Last Updated: March 25, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate that someone or something has moved to a specific southern region or direction.

Examples:

The company relocated to the south for better business opportunities.
After retiring, they relocated to the south to enjoy the warmer climate.
She relocated to the south to be closer to her family.
The birds have relocated to the south for the winter.
The team decided to relocate to the south for a fresh start.

Alternatives:

moved to the south
shifted to the south
transferred to the south
relocated to a southern region
relocated to a southern destination

This phrase could be used in a more informal or poetic context, treating 'south' as a destination or concept rather than a specific location.

Alternatives:

relocated south
relocated down south
relocated to the southern region
relocated to the southern destination
relocated to the southern part

Answer 1

relocated to the south

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

relocated to south

This phrase is correct but less common in standard English usage.

"relocated to the south" vs "relocated to south"

relocated to the south

relocated to south

Related Comparisons