relevant risk vs relative risk

These two phrases are not directly comparable as they have different meanings and contexts. 'Relevant risk' refers to a risk that is important or applicable in a specific situation, while 'relative risk' is a statistical measure used in epidemiology to compare the risk of a health event between two groups. Therefore, the choice between the two depends on the intended meaning and context.

Last updated: March 26, 2024 • 655 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to refer to a risk that is important or applicable in a specific context.

"relevant risk"

Use 'relevant risk' when discussing risks that are significant or pertinent in a particular situation or context.

Examples:

It is important to consider the relevant risks before making a decision.
The team identified the relevant risks associated with the project.
The report highlighted the relevant risks to the company's operations.
Assessing the relevant risks is crucial for effective risk management.
The insurance company analyzed the relevant risks to determine the premium.

Show examples from the web [+]

This data does not suggest a relevant risk for cancer initiation and progression under tocilizumab treatment.
The relevant risk weight shall be the risk weight as laid down in Table 1, with which the credit assessment of the position is associated in accordance with Section 4.
An acute and reproductive risk assessment for terrestrial vertebrates other than birds shall be conducted in accordance with the relevant risk quotient analysis.
A risk assessment for birds shall be conducted in accordance with the relevant risk quotient analysis.
The prohibition or restriction shall be based on the results of relevant risk assessments.
The prohibition or restriction referred to in point (b) may be based on the results of relevant risk assessments.
be based on the results of relevant risk assessments.
A CCP shall identify, and have an appropriate method for measuring, relevant risk factors specific to the contracts it clears that could affect its losses.
A risk assessment for aquatic organisms shall be conducted in accordance with the relevant risk quotient analysis.
How can the Commission guarantee that the stress tests will cover the relevant risk potential in all Member States?
Therefore it is appropriate to give the responsibility to choose the risk factors to the competent authority as it is in a better position to chose the relevant risk factors.
The test shall provide sufficient information to evaluate the toxicity of the plant protection product to the two indicator species (Aphidius rhopalosiphi (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and Typhlodromus pyri) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in accordance with the relevant risk quotient analysis.
Where the relevant risk quotient analysis indicates a chronic risk to earthworms a field study to determine effects under practical field conditions shall be conducted and reported as an option for refined risk assessment.
It may be necessary to conduct separate studies for relevant metabolites (especially toxins), where these products can constitute a relevant risk to non-target organisms and where their effects cannot be evaluated by the available results relating to the micro-organism.
According to SCHER, on-going critical uses in the aviation industry, the semiconductor industry, and the photographic industry do not appear to pose a relevant risk to the environment or human health, if releases into the environment and workplace exposure are minimised.
RW shall be calculated using the relevant risk weight formula set out in point 3 for the exposure, the PD of the obligor and the LGD of a comparable direct exposure to the protection provider.
According to SCHER, on-going critical uses in the aviation industry, the semiconductor industry and the photographic industry do not appear to pose a relevant risk to the environment or human health, if releases into the environment and workplace exposure are minimised.
It may be necessary to conduct separate studies for metabolites, degradation or reaction products, where these products can constitute a relevant risk to non-target organisms and where their effects cannot be evaluated by the available results relating to the active substance.
(e) split or segregate retail banking activities from trading and other non - utility activities in case of relevant risk assessed following common criteria;
where applicable, the quantitative impact of the change or extension on the risk weighted exposure amounts, or on the own funds requirements, or on the relevant risk numbers or sum of relevant own funds requirements and risk numbers;

Alternatives:

significant risk
important risk
pertinent risk
crucial risk
key risk

This phrase is correct and commonly used in epidemiology to refer to a statistical measure that compares the risk of a health event between two groups.

"relative risk"

Use 'relative risk' when discussing the comparison of risks between different groups, especially in the context of epidemiological studies.

Examples:

The study found a relative risk of 1.5 for smokers compared to non-smokers.
Researchers calculated the relative risk of developing the disease based on exposure to the environmental factor.
The relative risk of mortality was higher in the older age group.
Understanding the relative risk can help in assessing the impact of interventions on health outcomes.
The epidemiologist explained the concept of relative risk in the context of the study findings.

Show examples from the web [+]

There was a 23% relative risk reduction compared with amlodipine.
Incidence of patients with vertebral fracture and relative risk reduction
6 PROTELOS reduced the relative risk of new vertebral fracture by 41% over 3 years in the SOTI study (table 1).
Irbesartan significantly reduced the relative risk in the primary combined endpoint of doubling serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or all-cause mortality.
OSSEOR reduced the relative risk of new vertebral fracture by 41% over 3 years in the SOTI study (table 1).
However, the relative risk was similar in children as compared to adults.
Placebo relative risk (95% interval)
- a decrease in the relative risk for undergoing myocardial revascularisation procedures (coronary
- a reduction in the relative risk of undergoing myocardial revascularisation procedures (coronary
- a reduction in the relative risk of stroke by 19% (p = 0.048).
A relative risk of 1.60 (CI 0.95, 2.71) was observed in EVISTA treated patients compared to placebo.
A relative risk reduction of 61% was observed after 2 years (p=0.0006).
The relative risk compared to placebo for a similar composite endpoint (CV death, MI, stroke) was 1.14 (95% CI 0.61 - 2.12) with celecoxib 200 mg twice daily.
Venous thromboembolism HRT is associated with a higher relative risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE), i.e. deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism.
- the relative risk of undergoing revascularisation procedures (coronary artery bypass grafting or
- a reduction in the relative risk of undergoing myocardial revascularisation procedures (coronary
- the relative risk of undergoing revascularisation procedures (coronary artery bypass grafting or
An increased relative risk of thromboembolic events (RR 1.67, 95% CI:
FABLYN significantly decreased the incidence of non-vertebral fractures from 10.4% for placebo to 8.1% for FABLYN (relative risk reduction = 24%, p = 0.0020).
FABLYN significantly decreased the incidence of all clinical fractures from 12.1% for placebo to 9.3% for FABLYN (relative risk reduction = 25%, p = 0.0004).

Alternatives:

risk ratio
hazard ratio
odds ratio
incidence rate ratio
comparative risk

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

Emails and short texts
Proofreading & editing
Ready in 5-10 minutes

SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

Documents of any type (*.docx)
Advanced & Premium editing
Ready in as little as 4 hours

UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

Personalized answers to your language questions
Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
Ready in 24 hours

ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

3. Receive Your Polished Text

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Zubair
from Bangladesh

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Arturo
from Mexico

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Selena
from USA

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Ifiok
from Nigeria

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Wilson
from France

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Susan
from Germany

relevant risk vs relative risk

"relevant risk"

"relative risk"

Related Comparisons

2. Submit Your Text

3. Receive Your Polished Text