"references include" vs "references included"

Question

"references include" vs "references included"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'References included' is commonly used in the context of a list of references at the end of a document, indicating that the references are already present. 'References include' is used when mentioning the act of including references in a document.

Last Updated: March 11, 2024

This phrase is used to introduce a list of references that are being included in a document. It is commonly used in academic writing and research papers.

Examples:

The report's references include recent studies on the topic.
References include: 1. Johnson, M. 2. Lee, S.

Alternatives:

references are
references consist of
references contain
references are comprised of
references are made up of

This phrase is used to indicate that the references are already present in the document. It is commonly seen in academic papers, articles, and reports.

Examples:

Please find the references included at the end of the report.
References included: 1. Smith, J. et al. 2. Brown, A. and White, B.

Alternatives:

references provided
references listed
references attached
references appended
references enclosed

Answer 1

references include

This phrase is correct and is used when mentioning the act of including references in a document.

Answer 2

references included

This phrase is correct and commonly used in the context of a list of references at the end of a document.

"references include" vs "references included"

references include

references included

Related Comparisons