"reduce by" vs "reduce with"

Question

"reduce by" vs "reduce with"

Both 'reduce with' and 'reduce by' are correct phrases, but they are used in different contexts. 'Reduce with' is used when referring to the method or tool used to reduce something, while 'reduce by' is used when indicating the amount or percentage by which something is reduced.

Last Updated: March 29, 2024

This phrase is used when specifying the amount or percentage by which something is reduced. For example, 'We can reduce costs by 20% by implementing cost-saving measures.'

Examples:

You can reduce the price by $10.
The company aims to reduce emissions by 30%.
We need to reduce the sugar content by half.
The team plans to reduce errors by 25%.
She hopes to reduce her weight by 5 pounds.

Alternatives:

decrease by
cut by
lower by
diminish by
lessen by

This phrase is used when specifying the method or tool employed to reduce something. For example, 'We can reduce the file size by compressing it with the appropriate software.'

Examples:

You can reduce the cooking time with a pressure cooker.
We aim to reduce waste with recycling programs.
The company plans to reduce costs with automation.
You can reduce stress with meditation.
The team hopes to reduce errors with better training.

Alternatives:

decrease with
minimize with
diminish with
lessen with
alleviate with

Answer 1

reduce by

This phrase is correct and commonly used when indicating the amount or percentage by which something is reduced.

Answer 2

reduce with

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to the method or tool used to reduce something.

"reduce by" vs "reduce with"

reduce by

reduce with

Related Comparisons