"reduce to" vs "reduce into"

Question

"reduce to" vs "reduce into"

Both 'reduce to' and 'reduce into' are correct phrases, but they are used in different contexts. 'Reduce to' is commonly used when talking about simplifying or converting something to a smaller or simpler form. On the other hand, 'reduce into' is used when something is broken down or transformed into smaller parts or components.

Last Updated: March 29, 2024

The phrase 'reduce to' is used when something is simplified or converted to a smaller or simpler form. It implies a transformation or simplification process.

Examples:

The recipe will reduce to a thick sauce after simmering for 30 minutes.
His complex argument can be reduced to a few key points.
The company aims to reduce costs to improve profitability.
The problem can be reduced to a lack of communication between team members.
The novel was reduced to a short film adaptation.

Alternatives:

simplify to
convert to
boil down to
condense to
transform into

The phrase 'reduce into' is used when something is broken down or transformed into smaller parts or components. It implies a process of disintegration or transformation into multiple elements.

Examples:

The machine can reduce a large log into small wood chips.
The complex issue was reduced into several manageable tasks.
The software program can reduce a large file into smaller segments.
The artist reduced the painting into its basic colors.
The teacher helped the students reduce the complex problem into simpler steps.

Alternatives:

break down into
transform into smaller parts
disintegrate into
convert into smaller components
decompose into

Answer 1

reduce to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

reduce into

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"reduce to" vs "reduce into"

reduce to

reduce into

Related Comparisons