"reduce to" vs "reduce in"

Question

"reduce to" vs "reduce in"

Both 'reduce in' and 'reduce to' are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Reduce in' is used when talking about reducing something within a specific area or context, while 'reduce to' is used when indicating a change in state or condition.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024

This phrase is used when indicating a change in state or condition, often implying a transformation or simplification to a particular state or level.

Examples:

The complex issue was reduced to a simple explanation.
The argument was reduced to a mere disagreement.
The story was reduced to a few key points.
The problem was reduced to a single root cause.
The painting was reduced to basic shapes and colors.

Alternatives:

simplify to
transform into
convert to
condense to
boil down to

This phrase is used when referring to reducing something within a specific area or context. It indicates a decrease or simplification within a particular setting.

Examples:

We need to reduce costs in the marketing department.
The company aims to reduce waste in production processes.
It's important to reduce errors in data entry.
The goal is to reduce pollution in urban areas.
The government plans to reduce crime in the city.

Alternatives:

cut in
decrease in
minimize in
diminish in
lower in

Answer 1

reduce to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

reduce in

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"reduce to" vs "reduce in"

reduce to

reduce in

Related Comparisons