TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

psychological harassment vs moral harassment

Both 'psychological harassment' and 'moral harassment' are correct phrases, but they are used in different contexts. 'Psychological harassment' refers to the act of deliberately causing emotional or mental harm to someone, while 'moral harassment' is a term more commonly used in French-speaking countries to describe a form of workplace harassment that affects the victim's dignity and integrity.

Last updated: March 24, 2024 • 728 views

psychological harassment

This phrase is correct and commonly used to describe the act of deliberately causing emotional or mental harm to someone.

Use 'psychological harassment' when referring to the intentional act of causing emotional or mental harm to an individual, often in a workplace or social setting.

Examples:

  • The company has a zero-tolerance policy for psychological harassment.
  • She filed a complaint against her coworker for psychological harassment.
  • The effects of psychological harassment can be long-lasting.
  • The training program aims to prevent psychological harassment in the workplace.
  • The law prohibits psychological harassment in the workplace.
  • The applicant alleges, lastly, infringement of Article 12a of the Staff Regulations on psychological harassment.
  • Finally, and perhaps in a lighter vein, Mr Hughes talks about psychological harassment at the workplace.
  • Furthermore, the applicant was a victim of psychological harassment.
  • find that the applicant was subjected to, and experienced, psychological harassment in her job;
  • The applicant, an official of the Commission, lodged with her superiors two requests for assistance, dated 28 November 2003 and 23 December 2003, in which she claimed to be the victim of psychological harassment within her organisational unit.
  • An appeal lodged against the decision of the Commission rejecting the applicant's request that an administrative inquiry be opened in order to establish the psychological harassment she alleges to have been a victim of.
  • a survey on wellbeing at work in February 2005 revealed that, out of 10450 respondents, 1900 (18.4 %) said they had experienced psychological harassment during their career.
  • The Commission presented a communication with a White Paper on health and safety for the years up to 2006, which clearly states that the Commission will examine the suitability and advisability of a Community measure on psychological harassment and violence at work.
  • Annulment of the defendant's decision refusing the request for assistance relating to psychological harassment of which the applicant claims to have been a victim and claim for compensation for the non-material damage suffered.
  • Case F-2/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 24 February 2010 - Menghi v ENISA (Civil Service - Temporary staff - Dismissal following end of the probationary period - Psychological harassment)
  • In support of her action, the applicant maintains that, in the light of the number of tasks which were assigned to her by her superior and of the number of e-mails which he sent to her, it is indisputable that she experienced genuine psychological harassment.
  • Case F-26/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 9 March 2010 - N v Parliament (Staff cases - Officials - Action for damages - Admissibility - Psychological harassment - Duty of care - Non-material damage)
  • Nº 1014/2007 by Josiane Grunenberger (French), concerning the psychological harassment of public officials
  • The various forms of psychological harassment and violence at work likewise pose a special problem nowadays, requiring legislative action'.
  • The work programme for this year mentions an instrument on violence but not on psychological harassment.
  • The applicant also alleges a manifest error of assessment and claims that the development report he challenges amounts to psychological harassment of him.
  • It states that the Commission will 'examine the appropriateness and the scope of a Community instrument on psychological harassment and violence at work'.
  • - make a declaration that the applicant has suffered and experienced psychological harassment on the part of the two officials complained about;
  • On the next page under the heading 'The Commission will', it says, 'examine the appropriateness and the scope of a Community instrument on psychological harassment and violence at work'.
  • I face constant psychological harassment at my workplace, which is the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, mainly because I constantly have to address reports by Mr Hughes. I suspect that legislation is not going to stop that from occurring!

Alternatives:

  • emotional abuse
  • mental torment
  • bullying behavior
  • intimidation tactics
  • verbal aggression

moral harassment

This phrase is correct but less commonly used in English. It is more frequently used in French-speaking countries to describe a form of workplace harassment that affects the victim's dignity and integrity.

Use 'moral harassment' when referring to a form of workplace harassment that undermines the victim's dignity, integrity, or self-esteem, particularly in French-speaking countries.

Examples:

  • The law in this country specifically addresses moral harassment in the workplace.
  • She sought legal advice after experiencing moral harassment at her job.
  • The company's policy prohibits moral harassment of any kind.
  • The union is advocating for stronger measures against moral harassment.
  • The training program aims to raise awareness about moral harassment in the workplace.
  • Finally, the applicant seeks the award of damages due to moral harassment.
  • How many moral harassment cases have there been at the Commission in each of the last five years (figures for both informal and formal procedures), broken down by DG and service?
  • Twelve million workers, or 8% of the EU's workforce, claim that they have been victims of moral harassment in the workplace.
  • to the Council Subject: Moral harassment in the workplace
  • How many posts at the Commission are formally dedicated to investigating moral harassment cases, and how many work hours were spent on this in 2010?
  • Can the Commission state, for the cases investigated, the number of staff who have been disciplined for moral harassment over each of the last five years, and what the penalties were?
  • In cases of moral harassment at the Commission, in which situations, if any, are the Belgian police and judicial authorities empowered to intervene, and how often have they intervened in each of the past five years?
  • How many cases of alleged moral harassment were reported formally by Commission staff in each of the last five years, and how many cases were actually investigated all the way by the Commission?
  • Subject: Moral harassment at the Commission - general questions
  • Is the threshold for demonstrating moral harassment, particularly the requirement to demonstrate that the adverse practices occurred more than occasionally, low enough?
  • Does the Commission plan any further measures to tackle moral harassment in view of the proportion of both those being disciplined and those feeling harassed and invoking formal procedures?
  • Above all, moral harassment, pestering - which is one possible name for it - seems to me incompatible with Article 1 of the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights: 'Human dignity is inviolable.

Alternatives:

  • psychological harassment
  • emotional abuse
  • workplace bullying
  • dignity violation
  • integrity infringement

Related Comparisons

improper harassment vs inappropriate harassment send-only vs auto-send psychology theory vs psychological theory aged between 18-24 vs aged fro psychological counselling vs psychological consultations she flunked vs she flunk

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!