psychological harassment vs moral harassment

Both 'psychological harassment' and 'moral harassment' are correct phrases, but they are used in different contexts. 'Psychological harassment' refers to the act of deliberately causing emotional or mental harm to someone, while 'moral harassment' is a term more commonly used in French-speaking countries to describe a form of workplace harassment that affects the victim's dignity and integrity.

Last updated: March 24, 2024 • 740 views

psychological harassment

This phrase is correct and commonly used to describe the act of deliberately causing emotional or mental harm to someone.

Use 'psychological harassment' when referring to the intentional act of causing emotional or mental harm to an individual, often in a workplace or social setting.

Examples:

The company has a zero-tolerance policy for psychological harassment.
She filed a complaint against her coworker for psychological harassment.
The effects of psychological harassment can be long-lasting.
The training program aims to prevent psychological harassment in the workplace.
The law prohibits psychological harassment in the workplace.

Show examples from the web [+]

The applicant alleges, lastly, infringement of Article 12a of the Staff Regulations on psychological harassment.
Finally, and perhaps in a lighter vein, Mr Hughes talks about psychological harassment at the workplace.
Furthermore, the applicant was a victim of psychological harassment.
find that the applicant was subjected to, and experienced, psychological harassment in her job;
The applicant, an official of the Commission, lodged with her superiors two requests for assistance, dated 28 November 2003 and 23 December 2003, in which she claimed to be the victim of psychological harassment within her organisational unit.
An appeal lodged against the decision of the Commission rejecting the applicant's request that an administrative inquiry be opened in order to establish the psychological harassment she alleges to have been a victim of.
a survey on wellbeing at work in February 2005 revealed that, out of 10450 respondents, 1900 (18.4 %) said they had experienced psychological harassment during their career.
The Commission presented a communication with a White Paper on health and safety for the years up to 2006, which clearly states that the Commission will examine the suitability and advisability of a Community measure on psychological harassment and violence at work.
Annulment of the defendant's decision refusing the request for assistance relating to psychological harassment of which the applicant claims to have been a victim and claim for compensation for the non-material damage suffered.
Case F-2/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 24 February 2010 - Menghi v ENISA (Civil Service - Temporary staff - Dismissal following end of the probationary period - Psychological harassment)
In support of her action, the applicant maintains that, in the light of the number of tasks which were assigned to her by her superior and of the number of e-mails which he sent to her, it is indisputable that she experienced genuine psychological harassment.
Case F-26/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 9 March 2010 - N v Parliament (Staff cases - Officials - Action for damages - Admissibility - Psychological harassment - Duty of care - Non-material damage)
Nº 1014/2007 by Josiane Grunenberger (French), concerning the psychological harassment of public officials
The various forms of psychological harassment and violence at work likewise pose a special problem nowadays, requiring legislative action'.
The work programme for this year mentions an instrument on violence but not on psychological harassment.
The applicant also alleges a manifest error of assessment and claims that the development report he challenges amounts to psychological harassment of him.
It states that the Commission will 'examine the appropriateness and the scope of a Community instrument on psychological harassment and violence at work'.
- make a declaration that the applicant has suffered and experienced psychological harassment on the part of the two officials complained about;
On the next page under the heading 'The Commission will', it says, 'examine the appropriateness and the scope of a Community instrument on psychological harassment and violence at work'.
I face constant psychological harassment at my workplace, which is the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, mainly because I constantly have to address reports by Mr Hughes. I suspect that legislation is not going to stop that from occurring!

Alternatives:

emotional abuse
mental torment
bullying behavior
intimidation tactics
verbal aggression

moral harassment

This phrase is correct but less commonly used in English. It is more frequently used in French-speaking countries to describe a form of workplace harassment that affects the victim's dignity and integrity.

Use 'moral harassment' when referring to a form of workplace harassment that undermines the victim's dignity, integrity, or self-esteem, particularly in French-speaking countries.

Examples:

The law in this country specifically addresses moral harassment in the workplace.
She sought legal advice after experiencing moral harassment at her job.
The company's policy prohibits moral harassment of any kind.
The union is advocating for stronger measures against moral harassment.
The training program aims to raise awareness about moral harassment in the workplace.

Show examples from the web [+]

Finally, the applicant seeks the award of damages due to moral harassment.
How many moral harassment cases have there been at the Commission in each of the last five years (figures for both informal and formal procedures), broken down by DG and service?
Twelve million workers, or 8% of the EU's workforce, claim that they have been victims of moral harassment in the workplace.
to the Council Subject: Moral harassment in the workplace
How many posts at the Commission are formally dedicated to investigating moral harassment cases, and how many work hours were spent on this in 2010?
Can the Commission state, for the cases investigated, the number of staff who have been disciplined for moral harassment over each of the last five years, and what the penalties were?
In cases of moral harassment at the Commission, in which situations, if any, are the Belgian police and judicial authorities empowered to intervene, and how often have they intervened in each of the past five years?
How many cases of alleged moral harassment were reported formally by Commission staff in each of the last five years, and how many cases were actually investigated all the way by the Commission?
Subject: Moral harassment at the Commission - general questions
Is the threshold for demonstrating moral harassment, particularly the requirement to demonstrate that the adverse practices occurred more than occasionally, low enough?
Does the Commission plan any further measures to tackle moral harassment in view of the proportion of both those being disciplined and those feeling harassed and invoking formal procedures?
Above all, moral harassment, pestering - which is one possible name for it - seems to me incompatible with Article 1 of the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights: 'Human dignity is inviolable.

Alternatives:

psychological harassment
emotional abuse
workplace bullying
dignity violation
integrity infringement

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9).

"Thank you!"
Sachi Nakama July 2024
"I have literally been through chat, PI, claude, bard and bing and I got conflicting answers! Thank you! Human intelligence reigns!"
Retha July 2024
"Faster than AI"
CYNTHIA December 2023
"This was very helpful and I personally think this site is the best."
Kaden October 2023
"It was extremely thorough and very helpful!"
imperialelisa October 2023
"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"
Zubair Alam October 2023
"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."
Selena October 2023
"Without textranch I would be stuck!"
宏祐 October 2023
"Accuracy and fast response. Personal comments from editor. Thank you."
Clh September 2023
"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"
Arturo September 2023
"The fact that you can get reliable fast feedback on your texts."
Vinicius Antonio August 2023
"you guys are better than grammarly i'm being honest here"
ordinary July 2023
"OMG! This is really good than any other text correction tools I've used so far. Highly recommend this."
Vehan July 2023
"Very fast and accurate. thank you."
mojtaba July 2023
"I love this app because it's help to writing skills all of students ♥️"
Tarisini July 2023
"This was exactly the mistake I was looking for, the wording dind´t sound right at first. Better than grammarly!"
Ente July 2023
"The immediate help that I received was reassuring and very satisfactory. Thanks."
priiiyanshuu July 2023
"this helps A LOT for my studies."
kathnunez02 June 2023
"Woow!! I would never have expected such precision! Thank you soooo much!!"
Berta June 2023
"Real Time Editor and not AI. Many Thanks."
Priya June 2023
"The very first thing excites me about Textranch is how much your editors care."
sepideh June 2023
"The fact that texts are checked by human editors rather than by AI, etc. I appreciate this!"
Анна June 2023
"Feel welcome, immediate response, high quality feedback"
martin.roy June 2023
"This is the best app that I have ever seen"
Burulai May 2023

psychological harassment vs moral harassment