proposed in vs proposed for

Both "proposed in" and "proposed for" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Proposed in" is used when referring to a specific time or place where something was suggested, while "proposed for" is used when indicating the purpose or intended recipient of a proposal.

Last updated: March 25, 2024 • 1078 views

proposed in

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to a specific time or place where a proposal was suggested.

Use "proposed in" when indicating the time or place where a proposal was suggested. It shows the context in which the proposal was made.

Examples:

The new policy was proposed in the last board meeting.
The idea was proposed in the 19th century.

Alternatives:

suggested in
presented in
introduced in
recommended in
brought up in

proposed for

This phrase is correct and commonly used when indicating the purpose or intended recipient of a proposal.

Use "proposed for" when indicating the purpose or intended recipient of a proposal. It shows the reason or target of the proposal.

Examples:

The new project was proposed for the development of rural areas.
The budget proposal was proposed for approval by the finance committee.

Show examples from the web [+]

The amount proposed for the specific programme should be compatible with the expenditure ceilings under the financial perspective.
This is proposed for the human pharmaceuticals but is equally needed by the veterinary sector.
Other funding increases are proposed for youth and culture programmes.
assurance that no normal education system or programmes are proposed for financing.
The restricted areas proposed for hake are also unacceptable.
This amendment is consistent with the provisions proposed for Articles 5 and 6.
This figure is a significant decrease compared to the staffing figures proposed for EECMA.
The amount proposed for the specific programme must be compatible with the expenditure ceiling laid down by the financial perspective.
The amount proposed for the implementation of this Regulation is compatible with the expenditure ceilings under the financial perspective.
The amount proposed for the framework programme should be compatible with the expenditure ceilings under the financial perspective.
The remarks proposed for the new line make little reference to these new aspects.
· Consideration of compromise amendments proposed for vote in plenary
A further EUR 200m has been proposed for 2005.
However funding levels proposed for some other areas appear to be inadequate.
This amendment is consistent with the provisions proposed for Article 6.
We already sent an advance team to the address that he proposed for the rendezvous.
The text being proposed for adoption is an acceptable compromise.
The austerity packages proposed for exiting the crisis should not result in measures which could jeopardise economic recovery.
The changes proposed for this support mechanism will make it flexible.
The ceiling being proposed for each candidate is approximately EUR 11600.

Alternatives:

suggested for
intended for
recommended for
targeted for
aimed for

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9).

"Thank you!"
Sachi Nakama July 2024
"I have literally been through chat, PI, claude, bard and bing and I got conflicting answers! Thank you! Human intelligence reigns!"
Retha July 2024
"Faster than AI"
CYNTHIA December 2023
"This was very helpful and I personally think this site is the best."
Kaden October 2023
"It was extremely thorough and very helpful!"
imperialelisa October 2023
"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"
Zubair Alam October 2023
"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."
Selena October 2023
"Without textranch I would be stuck!"
宏祐 October 2023
"Accuracy and fast response. Personal comments from editor. Thank you."
Clh September 2023
"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"
Arturo September 2023
"The fact that you can get reliable fast feedback on your texts."
Vinicius Antonio August 2023
"you guys are better than grammarly i'm being honest here"
ordinary July 2023
"OMG! This is really good than any other text correction tools I've used so far. Highly recommend this."
Vehan July 2023
"Very fast and accurate. thank you."
mojtaba July 2023
"I love this app because it's help to writing skills all of students ♥️"
Tarisini July 2023
"This was exactly the mistake I was looking for, the wording dind´t sound right at first. Better than grammarly!"
Ente July 2023
"The immediate help that I received was reassuring and very satisfactory. Thanks."
priiiyanshuu July 2023
"this helps A LOT for my studies."
kathnunez02 June 2023
"Woow!! I would never have expected such precision! Thank you soooo much!!"
Berta June 2023
"Real Time Editor and not AI. Many Thanks."
Priya June 2023
"The very first thing excites me about Textranch is how much your editors care."
sepideh June 2023
"The fact that texts are checked by human editors rather than by AI, etc. I appreciate this!"
Анна June 2023
"Feel welcome, immediate response, high quality feedback"
martin.roy June 2023
"This is the best app that I have ever seen"
Burulai May 2023

proposed in vs proposed for

proposed in

proposed for

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying