TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

Products Comparison vs product comparisons

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Products comparison' is used when referring to the act of comparing multiple products, while 'product comparisons' is used to describe the comparisons themselves. They are not interchangeable as they serve different purposes.

Last updated: March 27, 2024 • 742 views

Products Comparison

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to the act of comparing multiple products.

This phrase is used to describe the process of comparing different products to evaluate their features, prices, etc.

Examples:

  • I need to do a products comparison before deciding which laptop to buy.
  • Member States shall notify the Commission of products which are eligible for EU-wide product comparisons, with prevention of waste as the central concern.
  • Member States shall notify the Commission of products which are eligible for EU-wide product comparisons, with prevention of waste as the central concern.
  • At this stage of the investigation it was not possible to change the basis of product comparison which is set out in the specifications table of the Commission's questionnaire and concerns all cooperating exporting producers.
  • For them, the existing rules offer consumers a sufficiently wide range to meet their expectations in terms of consumption needs and to allow for product comparison in a 25-member European Union.
  • The development of effective and meaningful indicators of the environmental pressures associated with the generation of waste at all levels, from product comparisons through action by local authorities to national measures.
  • Imports originating in Belarus were subject to the investigation and the aforementioned result of the undercutting is the result of a detailed product comparison.
  • The development of effective and meaningful indicators of the environmental pressures associated with the generation of waste aimed at contributing to the prevention of waste generation at all levels, from product comparisons at Community level through action by local authorities to national measures.
  • Agriculture within the EU generates very high quality, traceable and increasingly safe products in comparison to other countries.
  • This methodology was rejected because it ignores other important fields included in the product type comparison system, e.g. power, which therefore ensures better comparability.
  • Because immunogenicity analyses are product-specific, comparison of antibody rates with those from other products is not appropriate.
  • The effect is to double the price of non-French products in comparison with French ones, and this must accordingly unequivocally be regarded as a protectionist measure.
  • In addition, according to recent consumer research reports, Greece has recorded significantly higher prices for the same products in comparison with other EU Member States in which they are also available.
  • It should also be made clear that different procedures are to be applied, depending on the extent of proposed changes to a biocidal product in comparison with that which was originally authorised.
  • Because immunogenicity analyses are product-specific, comparison of antibody rates with those from other products is not appropriate.
  • Therefore, a comparison per product type was not possible.
  • The tests shall provide sufficient data to permit an evaluation of the level, duration and consistency of control or protection or other intended effects of the plant protection product in comparison to suitable reference products, where they exist.
  • The effect is to double the price of non-French products in comparison with French ones, and this must accordingly unequivocally be regarded as a protectionist measure.
  • Given the lack of cooperation, the comparison per product type was not possible.
  • The aforementioned issues cause serious problems to the competition of the European cultural products and services in comparison to those of non-Member States.
  • On consumer information and transparency: price comparison and product disclosure information is critical for consumers.

Alternatives:

  • comparing products
  • product comparison

product comparisons

This phrase is also correct and commonly used when referring to the actual comparisons made between products.

This phrase is used to describe the comparisons themselves, such as the results or findings of comparing different products.

Examples:

  • The product comparisons showed that the new model was superior in terms of performance.
  • Member States shall notify the Commission of products which are eligible for EU-wide product comparisons, with prevention of waste as the central concern.
  • The development of effective and meaningful indicators of the environmental pressures associated with the generation of waste aimed at contributing to the prevention of waste generation at all levels, from product comparisons at Community level through action by local authorities to national measures.
  • Member States shall notify the Commission of products which are eligible for EU-wide product comparisons, with prevention of waste as the central concern.
  • The development of effective and meaningful indicators of the environmental pressures associated with the generation of waste at all levels, from product comparisons through action by local authorities to national measures.
  • At this stage of the investigation it was not possible to change the basis of product comparison which is set out in the specifications table of the Commission's questionnaire and concerns all cooperating exporting producers.
  • For them, the existing rules offer consumers a sufficiently wide range to meet their expectations in terms of consumption needs and to allow for product comparison in a 25-member European Union.
  • Imports originating in Belarus were subject to the investigation and the aforementioned result of the undercutting is the result of a detailed product comparison.
  • Agriculture within the EU generates very high quality, traceable and increasingly safe products in comparison to other countries.
  • This methodology was rejected because it ignores other important fields included in the product type comparison system, e.g. power, which therefore ensures better comparability.
  • Because immunogenicity analyses are product-specific, comparison of antibody rates with those from other products is not appropriate.
  • The effect is to double the price of non-French products in comparison with French ones, and this must accordingly unequivocally be regarded as a protectionist measure.
  • In addition, according to recent consumer research reports, Greece has recorded significantly higher prices for the same products in comparison with other EU Member States in which they are also available.
  • It should also be made clear that different procedures are to be applied, depending on the extent of proposed changes to a biocidal product in comparison with that which was originally authorised.
  • Because immunogenicity analyses are product-specific, comparison of antibody rates with those from other products is not appropriate.
  • Therefore, a comparison per product type was not possible.
  • The tests shall provide sufficient data to permit an evaluation of the level, duration and consistency of control or protection or other intended effects of the plant protection product in comparison to suitable reference products, where they exist.
  • The effect is to double the price of non-French products in comparison with French ones, and this must accordingly unequivocally be regarded as a protectionist measure.
  • Given the lack of cooperation, the comparison per product type was not possible.
  • The aforementioned issues cause serious problems to the competition of the European cultural products and services in comparison to those of non-Member States.
  • On consumer information and transparency: price comparison and product disclosure information is critical for consumers.

Alternatives:

  • comparisons of products
  • product contrasts

Related Comparisons

love vs likr Hate vs love i vs love love vs like sex vs love

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!