TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

product in which was fried vs product which was fried

The phrase 'product which was fried' is correct, while 'product in which was fried' is incorrect. 'Which' is used to introduce a relative clause that provides additional information about the product being fried.

Last updated: March 21, 2024 • 482 views

product in which was fried

This phrase is not correct in English. The preposition 'in' is not used correctly in this context.

The correct phrase should use 'which' to introduce a relative clause that describes the product being fried.

product which was fried

This phrase is correct in English. 'Which' is used to introduce a relative clause that provides additional information about the product being fried.

Use 'which' to introduce a relative clause that describes the product that was fried.

Examples:

  • The chicken, which was fried, was delicious.
  • The fish, which was fried, was served with a side of vegetables.
  • The product, which was fried under the same conditions as used in Example 1, had an excellent light brown color, and only slight pu?ing was evident. The.

Alternatives:

  • product that was fried
  • product fried
  • fried product
  • product that was cooked by frying
  • product that underwent frying

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!