TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

product contaminated vs contaminated product

Both "product contaminated" and "contaminated product" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Product contaminated" is used when emphasizing the action of contaminating the product, while "contaminated product" is used when focusing on the state of the product after contamination.

Last updated: March 22, 2024 • 686 views

product contaminated

This phrase is correct and can be used when emphasizing the action of contaminating the product.

This phrase is used to highlight the action of contaminating the product, indicating that the product has been contaminated by something.

Examples:

  • The water supply was product contaminated by industrial waste.
  • The food was product contaminated with bacteria.
  • The air quality was product contaminated by pollutants.
  • The German medical authorities have warned, however, that cucumbers might not be the only product contaminated with e coli bacteria.
  • Irish pork products contaminated with dioxins were found during checks carried out in France and Belgium.
  • Subject: German food products contaminated with dioxins
  • Does it believe that there is a public health risk in countries where products contaminated with dioxin have been offered for sale? 2.
  • provided products contaminated by exhaust fumes are withdrawn from the market.
  • Madam President, Commissioner, the discovery of products contaminated with dioxins and their distribution through various commercial channels is a most serious occurrence.
  • This means that labelling is clearly needed for those products that contain genetically-modified organisms - some would say, for those products contaminated by genetically-modified organisms.
  • Furthermore, In view of the health risks posed by food products contaminated with bacteria, how does the Commission intend to step up checks to safeguard the European public?
  • A shipment of maize products contaminated by Bt10 left the United States before the availability of the analytical results of the testing and was notified by the importer prior to the arrival of the vessel to Ireland.
  • It is nevertheless appropriate that Member States keep monitoring, for a further period of six months, on the basis of a proper level of random testing, whether maize products contaminated by Bt 10 are still present on the market.
  • The CSN maintains that the products contaminated with Cs-137 have not been duly confined, that the inactivated waste has not been fully covered over and that water is flowing over gypsum and containment materials in contact with the contaminated material.
  • Egypt is a major exporter of peanuts to the Community and the exposure of the population to peanuts or peanut products contaminated with aflatoxin constitutes a serious threat to public health within the Community;
  • The Commission immediately introduced an export ban on possibly contaminated products, coupled with a very strict monitoring system.
  • The German authorities made good progress in tracing and recalling potentially contaminated products.
  • The Commission has systematically reminded national authorities of this obligation to carry out adequate checks and withdraw contaminated products.
  • The placing on the market of the contaminated products was thus prevented.
  • provided products cannot be contaminated by waste or leakage therefrom.
  • Financial damage may arise for farmers, feed and food processors and traders, in particular where their products are contaminated with GMOs to such an extent that they must be labelled as genetically modified.
  • Compensation for losses resulting from measures aimed at preventing products being contaminated with dioxin
  • Objective: Compensation for losses resulting from measures aimed at preventing products being contaminated with dioxin

Alternatives:

  • product that was contaminated
  • product that has been contaminated
  • product that got contaminated
  • product that became contaminated
  • product that was polluted

contaminated product

This phrase is correct and is commonly used to describe a product that has been contaminated.

This phrase is used to describe a product that has been contaminated by something, indicating the state of the product after contamination.

Examples:

  • Do not consume contaminated product.
  • The company recalled the contaminated product from the market.
  • The contaminated product posed a health risk to consumers.
  • As enterprises seek to maximise profits, there is a danger that the cheap, contaminated product could also appear on the European market.
  • The comprehensive system of traceability within food and feed businesses ensures that the withdrawal or recall of a possible contaminated product can be undertaken in an effective and accurate way.
  • Person gets into contact with contaminated product by ingestion, inhalation or skin contact
  • The Commission immediately introduced an export ban on possibly contaminated products, coupled with a very strict monitoring system.
  • The German authorities made good progress in tracing and recalling potentially contaminated products.
  • The Commission has systematically reminded national authorities of this obligation to carry out adequate checks and withdraw contaminated products.
  • The placing on the market of the contaminated products was thus prevented.
  • However, measures have been taken to remove highly contaminated products from the food chain to limit human exposure as much as possible.
  • It adds that under the existing EU rules the annual cancer death toll in Germany could increase by 150000, should a significant number of people consume the contaminated products.
  • If contaminated products are indeed in circulation, will it take the necessary action to ensure that they are withdrawn immediately? 2.
  • Although some information has been provided about export flows of potentially contaminated products, its reliability cannot be guaranteed.
  • There can be no doubt that European Union citizens no longer wish to have daily contact with toxins, and do not wish to consume contaminated products.
  • The bottom line is that however important Japan may be as a trading partner, European citizens must be protected from any risk from radioactive contaminated products.
  • During the vote, an oral amendment that provides for the compensation of farmers adversely affected by the lost opportunity of selling any contaminated products was also adopted, again with our support.
  • to withdraw contaminated products from the market and to destroy them under controlled conditions.
  • Does the Commission have steps it can take to stop the trade in contaminated products?
  • Has the Commission taken action to limit the import of possibly contaminated products from South Korea?
  • It is, therefore, the operators responsible for first placing food and feed on the market who should be under the duty to prove that they do not contain the contaminated products.
  • In addition, it was revealed that Community decisions concerning the withdrawal from the market of potentially contaminated products had been inadequately enforced by the Belgian authorities.
  • Commission Decision 2006/578/EC of 23 August 2006 on emergency measures regarding the non-authorised genetically modified organism LL RICE 601 in rice products was adopted to ban provisionally the placing on the market of contaminated products.

Alternatives:

  • product that is contaminated
  • product with contamination
  • product affected by contamination
  • product that has contamination
  • product that has been polluted

Related Comparisons

inferior product vs defective product checking vs Inspecting point of view vs viewpoint maintenance product vs care product resistant product vs durable product

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!