"performance in" vs "performance for"

Question

"performance in" vs "performance for"

Both "performance in" and "performance for" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Performance in" is used when referring to the quality of someone's work or actions within a specific area or field, while "performance for" is used when talking about the purpose or benefit of someone's work or actions.

Last Updated: March 30, 2024

This phrase is used when referring to the quality of someone's work or actions within a specific area or field.

Examples:

Her performance in the play was outstanding.
His performance in the exam was below average.
The team's performance in the tournament was exceptional.

Alternatives:

achievement in
results in
success in
competence in
effectiveness in

This phrase is used when talking about the purpose or benefit of someone's work or actions.

Examples:

His performance for the company has been outstanding.
The team's performance for the charity event was impressive.
She gave a great performance for her fans.

Alternatives:

contribution to
efforts for
work for
output for
impact for

Answer 1

performance in

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

performance for

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"performance in" vs "performance for"

performance in

performance for

Related Comparisons