people of worst dna damage vs people of worse dna damage

Both phrases are not correct. The correct form should be 'people with the worst DNA damage' or 'people with worse DNA damage'. The preposition 'of' is not appropriate in this context.

Last updated: March 26, 2024 • 754 views

This phrase is not correct in English. The preposition 'of' is not used in this context.

"people of worst dna damage"

The correct form should be 'people with the worst DNA damage'. Use 'with' to indicate the possession or presence of the DNA damage.

Show examples from the web [+]

Mirtazapine was not genotoxic in a series of tests for gene mutation and chromosomal and DNA damage.
assaying other kinds of DNA damage.
The end point measured is indicative of DNA damage and subsequent repair in liver cells.
It is thus an appropriate site to measure DNA damage in vivo.
The Kalrsruhe study indicated DNA damage in rat and human cells, and this could potentially lead to carcinogenic or mutagenic effects in those eating these foods.
The results of research showing that the herbicide can not only cause deformities, but also hormone imbalances, DNA damage and cancer, were apparently ignored.
The end-point measured is indicative of DNA damage and subsequent repair in liver cells.
During the ordovician extinction, Earth could have been blasted with enough deadly radiation from the galactic bow shock to unleash genetic mutations and DNA damage that wiped out over half of all species.
DNA DAMAGE AND REPAIR - UNSCHEDULED DNA SYNTHESIS - MAMMALIAN CELLS IN VITRO
The liver is usually the major site of metabolism of absorbed compounds. It is thus an appropriate site to measure DNA damage in vivo.
In addition, it is possible that a mutagen reacts with DNA but the DNA damage is not repaired via an excision repair process.
A negative result indicates that, under the test conditions, the test substance does not induce DNA damage that is detectable by this test.
In in vivo studies in rats, atazanavir did not induce micronuclei in bone marrow, DNA damage in duodenum (comet assay), or unscheduled DNA repair in liver at plasma and tissue concentrations exceeding those that were clastogenic in vitro.
The cytotoxic effects of azacitidine may result from multiple mechanisms, including inhibition of DNA, RNA and protein synthesis, incorporation into RNA and DNA, and activation of DNA damage pathways.
If negative in 6.6.4 but positive in-vitro tests then undertake a second in-vivo study to examine whether mutagenicity or evidence of DNA damage can be demonstrated in tissue other than bone marrow
DNA damage and repair - unscheduled DNA synthesis - mammalian cells - in vitro, (Method B.18)
assay for DNA damage, e.g. by alkaline elution, in somatic cells.
assay for DNA damage, e.g. by alkaline elution, in somatic cells.
DNA damage and repair - unscheduled DNA synthesis - mammalian cells - in vitro, (Method B.)
Saquinavir does not induce chromosomal damage in vivo in the mouse micronucleus assay or in vitro in human peripheral blood lymphocytes and does not induce primary DNA damage in vitro in the unscheduled DNA synthesis test.

Alternatives:

people with the worst DNA damage
people with worse DNA damage

This phrase is also not correct in English. The preposition 'of' is not used in this context.

"people of worse dna damage"

The correct form should be 'people with worse DNA damage'. Use 'with' to indicate the possession or presence of the DNA damage.

Show examples from the web [+]

Mirtazapine was not genotoxic in a series of tests for gene mutation and chromosomal and DNA damage.
assaying other kinds of DNA damage.
The end point measured is indicative of DNA damage and subsequent repair in liver cells.
It is thus an appropriate site to measure DNA damage in vivo.
The Kalrsruhe study indicated DNA damage in rat and human cells, and this could potentially lead to carcinogenic or mutagenic effects in those eating these foods.
The results of research showing that the herbicide can not only cause deformities, but also hormone imbalances, DNA damage and cancer, were apparently ignored.
The end-point measured is indicative of DNA damage and subsequent repair in liver cells.
During the ordovician extinction, Earth could have been blasted with enough deadly radiation from the galactic bow shock to unleash genetic mutations and DNA damage that wiped out over half of all species.
DNA DAMAGE AND REPAIR - UNSCHEDULED DNA SYNTHESIS - MAMMALIAN CELLS IN VITRO
The liver is usually the major site of metabolism of absorbed compounds. It is thus an appropriate site to measure DNA damage in vivo.
In addition, it is possible that a mutagen reacts with DNA but the DNA damage is not repaired via an excision repair process.
A negative result indicates that, under the test conditions, the test substance does not induce DNA damage that is detectable by this test.
In in vivo studies in rats, atazanavir did not induce micronuclei in bone marrow, DNA damage in duodenum (comet assay), or unscheduled DNA repair in liver at plasma and tissue concentrations exceeding those that were clastogenic in vitro.
The cytotoxic effects of azacitidine may result from multiple mechanisms, including inhibition of DNA, RNA and protein synthesis, incorporation into RNA and DNA, and activation of DNA damage pathways.
If negative in 6.6.4 but positive in-vitro tests then undertake a second in-vivo study to examine whether mutagenicity or evidence of DNA damage can be demonstrated in tissue other than bone marrow
DNA damage and repair - unscheduled DNA synthesis - mammalian cells - in vitro, (Method B.18)
assay for DNA damage, e.g. by alkaline elution, in somatic cells.
assay for DNA damage, e.g. by alkaline elution, in somatic cells.
DNA damage and repair - unscheduled DNA synthesis - mammalian cells - in vitro, (Method B.)
Saquinavir does not induce chromosomal damage in vivo in the mouse micronucleus assay or in vitro in human peripheral blood lymphocytes and does not induce primary DNA damage in vitro in the unscheduled DNA synthesis test.

Alternatives:

people with worse DNA damage
people with the worst DNA damage

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

Emails and short texts
Proofreading & editing
Ready in 5-10 minutes

SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

Documents of any type (*.docx)
Advanced & Premium editing
Ready in as little as 4 hours

UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

Personalized answers to your language questions
Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
Ready in 24 hours

ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

3. Receive Your Polished Text

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Zubair
from Bangladesh

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Arturo
from Mexico

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Selena
from USA

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Ifiok
from Nigeria

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Wilson
from France

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Susan
from Germany

people of worst dna damage vs people of worse dna damage