TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

outcome of the test activity vs outcome of the test activities

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Outcome of the test activity' refers to the result of a single test, while 'outcome of the test activities' implies the results of multiple tests.

Last updated: March 27, 2024 • 563 views

outcome of the test activity

This phrase is correct and commonly used to refer to the result of a single test.

This phrase is used to describe the result or conclusion of a specific test that has been conducted.

Examples:

  • The outcome of the test activity was positive.
  • We are still waiting for the outcome of the test activity.
  • Depending on the outcome of the tests and taking into consideration the whole toxicity profile of the substance as well as the intended use, additional investigations may be indicated.
  • Additional tests may be indicated depending on the outcome of the tests and taking into consideration the whole toxicity profile of the substance as well as the intended use.
  • The task is double: the banks must do the test and governments must be ready to deal with the outcome of the tests.
  • The number of bovine animals tested within each subpopulation referred to in Chapter A, Section I, point 2 to 5, the method for sample selection and the outcome of the tests.
  • Can the outcome of the test phase be left to any extent in doubt?
  • Updates to the business continuity policy and disaster recovery plan shall take into consideration the outcome of the tests and recommendations of independent reviews and other reviews and of competent authorities.
  • Where the test is conducted in the package form and the packaging is changed, a further test shall be conducted where it is considered that the change in packaging will affect the outcome of the test.
  • This test method uses oral administration of the test substance.
  • Normally five concentrations of the test substance are required, regardless of the test design (see Section 1.7.2).
  • Normally five concentrations of the test substance are required, regardless of the test design (see Section 1.7.2).
  • Where a chamber is used its design should minimise crowding of the test animals and maximise their exposure by inhalation of the test substance.
  • The number of ovine and caprine animals and flocks tested within each subpopulation referred to in Chapter A, Section II, points 2 to 4, the method for sample selection and the outcome of the tests.
  • The test report shall contain the details and results of the tests carried out.
  • At the beginning of the test, all protection devices which would affect the function of the tested-device and which are relevant to the outcome of the test shall be operational.
  • The principle of the test involves exposing fish to a solution or dispersion at known concentrations of the test substance in water.
  • The eyes of the test animals should not be washed out for 24 hours following instillation of the test substance.
  • For the evaluation of mutagenicity data the quality of the test performance and the degree of validation of the test method have to be considered.
  • Intravenous (IV) administration of the test chemical and measurement of the test chemical in blood and/or excreta may be used to establish bioavailability or relative oral absorption.
  • Guidance on how many different soils to use at the various stages of the test is given under 1.9. Performance of the test.
  • The duration of the test should normally not exceed 60 days unless the characteristics of the original water sample are maintained by renewal of the test suspension.

Alternatives:

  • result of the test activity
  • conclusion of the test activity
  • findings of the test activity
  • outcome of the assessment
  • outcome of the examination

outcome of the test activities

This phrase is correct and is used when referring to the results of multiple tests or testing activities.

This phrase is used to describe the collective results or conclusions of several tests or testing activities.

Examples:

  • The outcomes of the test activities varied widely.
  • We need to analyze the outcomes of the test activities.
  • Depending on the outcome of the tests and taking into consideration the whole toxicity profile of the substance as well as the intended use, additional investigations may be indicated.
  • Additional tests may be indicated depending on the outcome of the tests and taking into consideration the whole toxicity profile of the substance as well as the intended use.
  • The task is double: the banks must do the test and governments must be ready to deal with the outcome of the tests.
  • The number of bovine animals tested within each subpopulation referred to in Chapter A, Section I, point 2 to 5, the method for sample selection and the outcome of the tests.
  • Can the outcome of the test phase be left to any extent in doubt?
  • Updates to the business continuity policy and disaster recovery plan shall take into consideration the outcome of the tests and recommendations of independent reviews and other reviews and of competent authorities.
  • Where the test is conducted in the package form and the packaging is changed, a further test shall be conducted where it is considered that the change in packaging will affect the outcome of the test.
  • This test method uses oral administration of the test substance.
  • Normally five concentrations of the test substance are required, regardless of the test design (see Section 1.7.2).
  • Normally five concentrations of the test substance are required, regardless of the test design (see Section 1.7.2).
  • Where a chamber is used its design should minimise crowding of the test animals and maximise their exposure by inhalation of the test substance.
  • The number of ovine and caprine animals and flocks tested within each subpopulation referred to in Chapter A, Section II, points 2 to 4, the method for sample selection and the outcome of the tests.
  • The test report shall contain the details and results of the tests carried out.
  • At the beginning of the test, all protection devices which would affect the function of the tested-device and which are relevant to the outcome of the test shall be operational.
  • The principle of the test involves exposing fish to a solution or dispersion at known concentrations of the test substance in water.
  • The eyes of the test animals should not be washed out for 24 hours following instillation of the test substance.
  • For the evaluation of mutagenicity data the quality of the test performance and the degree of validation of the test method have to be considered.
  • Intravenous (IV) administration of the test chemical and measurement of the test chemical in blood and/or excreta may be used to establish bioavailability or relative oral absorption.
  • Guidance on how many different soils to use at the various stages of the test is given under 1.9. Performance of the test.
  • The duration of the test should normally not exceed 60 days unless the characteristics of the original water sample are maintained by renewal of the test suspension.

Alternatives:

  • results of the test activities
  • conclusions of the test activities
  • findings of the test activities
  • outcomes of the testing activities
  • results of the series of tests

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!