only the influence of vs was detected statistically significant

These two phrases are not directly comparable as they serve different purposes. 'Only the influence of' is used to introduce a specific factor or element, while 'was detected statistically significant' is a statement about the statistical significance of a finding. They can be used in different contexts and are not interchangeable.

Last updated: March 17, 2024 • 836 views

only the influence of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to introduce a specific factor or element.

This phrase is used to highlight a particular influence or impact among others. It is often followed by a noun or noun phrase.

Examples:

Only the influence of social media on consumer behavior was considered in the study.
Only the influence of genetics was found to be significant in the research.

Show examples from the web [+]

May 25, 2011 ... Cost-effectiveness of treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia with chemotherapy only: the influence of new medication and ...
Restrained emotions are good for men only: the influence of emotional restraint on perceptions of competence. Ursula Hess ...
In the present work, to evaluate only the influence of the iontophoresis without the contribution of the passive flux and to compare this result to the iontophoresis ...
to the fat component only. The influence of heating and other processes involved in the preparation of milk for food were also incidentally investigated.

was detected statistically significant

This phrase is incorrect in English. The correct form would be 'was statistically significant' or 'was detected to be statistically significant.'

The correct form is 'was statistically significant' when describing the significance of a finding in a study or research.

Show examples from the web [+]

No lesion less than 1 cm in size was detected. Statistically significant correlation was established between the visibility of of tumour in CEUS and the size of a ...
Sep 28, 2009 ... ... and GSTT1 with null genotype was detected. Statistically significant difference was detected only in CSA-type of aberrations in GSTT1 gene.
No adverse vital sign change was detected. Statistically significant changes after imaging included a HR decrease from 65.2 beats per minute (bpm) to 60.3 bpm ...
day plate counts, and the presence of coliforms was detected. Statistically significant associations between lower total chlorine concentrations and the presence ...

Alternatives:

was statistically significant
was found to be statistically significant
was determined to be statistically significant
showed statistical significance
was deemed statistically significant

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9).

"Thank you!"
Sachi Nakama July 2024
"I have literally been through chat, PI, claude, bard and bing and I got conflicting answers! Thank you! Human intelligence reigns!"
Retha July 2024
"Faster than AI"
CYNTHIA December 2023
"This was very helpful and I personally think this site is the best."
Kaden October 2023
"It was extremely thorough and very helpful!"
imperialelisa October 2023
"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"
Zubair Alam October 2023
"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."
Selena October 2023
"Without textranch I would be stuck!"
宏祐 October 2023
"Accuracy and fast response. Personal comments from editor. Thank you."
Clh September 2023
"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"
Arturo September 2023
"The fact that you can get reliable fast feedback on your texts."
Vinicius Antonio August 2023
"you guys are better than grammarly i'm being honest here"
ordinary July 2023
"OMG! This is really good than any other text correction tools I've used so far. Highly recommend this."
Vehan July 2023
"Very fast and accurate. thank you."
mojtaba July 2023
"I love this app because it's help to writing skills all of students ♥️"
Tarisini July 2023
"This was exactly the mistake I was looking for, the wording dind´t sound right at first. Better than grammarly!"
Ente July 2023
"The immediate help that I received was reassuring and very satisfactory. Thanks."
priiiyanshuu July 2023
"this helps A LOT for my studies."
kathnunez02 June 2023
"Woow!! I would never have expected such precision! Thank you soooo much!!"
Berta June 2023
"Real Time Editor and not AI. Many Thanks."
Priya June 2023
"The very first thing excites me about Textranch is how much your editors care."
sepideh June 2023
"The fact that texts are checked by human editors rather than by AI, etc. I appreciate this!"
Анна June 2023
"Feel welcome, immediate response, high quality feedback"
martin.roy June 2023
"This is the best app that I have ever seen"
Burulai May 2023

only the influence of vs was detected statistically significant