🎁 A holiday package to celebrate the season! Click here and shop now!

TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

only the influence of vs was detected statistically significant

These two phrases are not directly comparable as they serve different purposes. 'Only the influence of' is used to introduce a specific factor or element, while 'was detected statistically significant' is a statement about the statistical significance of a finding. They can be used in different contexts and are not interchangeable.

Last updated: March 17, 2024 • 850 views

only the influence of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to introduce a specific factor or element.

This phrase is used to highlight a particular influence or impact among others. It is often followed by a noun or noun phrase.

Examples:

  • Only the influence of social media on consumer behavior was considered in the study.
  • Only the influence of genetics was found to be significant in the research.
  • May 25, 2011 ... Cost-effectiveness of treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia with chemotherapy only: the influence of new medication and ...
  • Restrained emotions are good for men only: the influence of emotional restraint on perceptions of competence. Ursula Hess ...
  • In the present work, to evaluate only the influence of the iontophoresis without the contribution of the passive flux and to compare this result to the iontophoresis ...
  • to the fat component only. The influence of heating and other processes involved in the preparation of milk for food were also incidentally investigated.

was detected statistically significant

This phrase is incorrect in English. The correct form would be 'was statistically significant' or 'was detected to be statistically significant.'

The correct form is 'was statistically significant' when describing the significance of a finding in a study or research.
  • No lesion less than 1 cm in size was detected. Statistically significant correlation was established between the visibility of of tumour in CEUS and the size of a ...
  • Sep 28, 2009 ... ... and GSTT1 with null genotype was detected. Statistically significant difference was detected only in CSA-type of aberrations in GSTT1 gene.
  • No adverse vital sign change was detected. Statistically significant changes after imaging included a HR decrease from 65.2 beats per minute (bpm) to 60.3 bpm ...
  • day plate counts, and the presence of coliforms was detected. Statistically significant associations between lower total chlorine concentrations and the presence ...

Alternatives:

  • was statistically significant
  • was found to be statistically significant
  • was determined to be statistically significant
  • showed statistical significance
  • was deemed statistically significant

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!

×

💝 TextRanch Holidays Offer! 💝️

25% special discount
Stock up on credits for the entire year!

Grab this offer now!