⚡ Black Friday Offer: Click here and shop now!

TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

one part still wait for the manufacturer to confirm vs one part still waiting for the manufacturer to confirm

The correct phrase is 'one part still waiting for the manufacturer to confirm.' The verb 'waiting' should be in the present participle form to match the present tense of the sentence. 'Still waiting' is a common expression used to indicate that something is ongoing.

Last updated: March 30, 2024 • 630 views

one part still wait for the manufacturer to confirm

This phrase is incorrect. The verb 'wait' should be in the present participle form 'waiting' to match the present tense of the sentence.

The correct form is 'one part still waiting for the manufacturer to confirm.' Use 'waiting' to indicate an ongoing action in the present.
  • It is therefore important for the manufacturer to hold and maintain the technical documentation for a reasonable period.
  • However, it should be possible for the manufacturer to receive an advance before completion of the controls.
  • It must be possible for the manufacturer to be consulted and informed about the progress of his file.
  • There have been a number of complaints that it will be costly for the manufacturers to have their materials and products approved.
  • It is optional for the manufacturer to assign a number to the declaration of conformity.
  • the requirement for the manufacturer to provide a statement of compliance with the requirements limiting off-cycle emissions.
  • It also agrees on the need for the manufacturer to apply adequate controls to any third parties it uses for design and manufacture.
  • It is important, therefore, for the manufacturer to be involved in all decisions in the run-up to the final decision.
  • The easiest way for the manufacturers to fulfil the proposed legislation is to changeover to diesel engines.
  • It is for the manufacturers to provide evidence that the specific allergen derivative they use is not likely to cause an adverse reaction in order to be exempted from indicating it on the label.
  • lays down a reasonable time limit for the manufacturer to remedy the instance of non-compliance;
  • I think we have done that now: we have put in incentives for the manufacturers to develop cleaner and greener technology rather than threatening them all the time with swingeing penalties.
  • The time frame for introducing the ecodesign requirements should be sufficient for the manufacturers to redesign their products subject to this Regulation.
  • The deadlines - 2011 for new types and 2017 for new models - are ambitious enough, and it will also be possible for the manufacturers to meet them.
  • Adequate instructions are sufficient for the purpose of the driver that is reasonable for the manufacturer to will depend on the intended use of the system (functionality, context etc.).
  • (c) where third party involvement is mandatory, the need for the manufacturer to have a choice between quality assurance and product certification modules as set out in Annex I;
  • This is usually due to missing information that is required in order for the manufacturer to identify the individual vehicles, more precisely the identification code composed of the type, variant and version of the vehicles concerned.
  • This undertaking must include an obligation for the manufacturer to notify the competent authorities of the following incidents immediately on learning of them:
  • It should be noted in this connection that the Decision does not call into question the possibility for the manufacturer to tailor its commercial policy to the requirements of different national markets with a view to achieving better penetration rates in those markets.
  • It is therefore necessary to provide in Annex VI to both Directives 96/48/EC and 2001/16/EC the possibility for the manufacturer to apply for first step (design or production phase) assessments, which will lead to Intermediate Statements of Verification (ISV) issued by the notified body.

one part still waiting for the manufacturer to confirm

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English. 'Still waiting' is a common expression to indicate that something is ongoing.

Use this phrase to indicate that a part is still awaiting confirmation from the manufacturer. The present participle 'waiting' matches the present tense of the sentence.
  • It is therefore important for the manufacturer to hold and maintain the technical documentation for a reasonable period.
  • However, it should be possible for the manufacturer to receive an advance before completion of the controls.
  • We're still waiting for toxicology to confirm, but it does look like he was dead before he hit the ground.
  • It must be possible for the manufacturer to be consulted and informed about the progress of his file.
  • There have been a number of complaints that it will be costly for the manufacturers to have their materials and products approved.
  • It is optional for the manufacturer to assign a number to the declaration of conformity.
  • the requirement for the manufacturer to provide a statement of compliance with the requirements limiting off-cycle emissions.
  • It also agrees on the need for the manufacturer to apply adequate controls to any third parties it uses for design and manufacture.
  • It is important, therefore, for the manufacturer to be involved in all decisions in the run-up to the final decision.
  • The easiest way for the manufacturers to fulfil the proposed legislation is to changeover to diesel engines.
  • It is for the manufacturers to provide evidence that the specific allergen derivative they use is not likely to cause an adverse reaction in order to be exempted from indicating it on the label.
  • lays down a reasonable time limit for the manufacturer to remedy the instance of non-compliance;
  • I think we have done that now: we have put in incentives for the manufacturers to develop cleaner and greener technology rather than threatening them all the time with swingeing penalties.
  • The time frame for introducing the ecodesign requirements should be sufficient for the manufacturers to redesign their products subject to this Regulation.
  • The deadlines - 2011 for new types and 2017 for new models - are ambitious enough, and it will also be possible for the manufacturers to meet them.
  • I'm still waiting for Navy Intelligence or United Equinox to confirm the project even exists. ZIVA:
  • Adequate instructions are sufficient for the purpose of the driver that is reasonable for the manufacturer to will depend on the intended use of the system (functionality, context etc.).
  • (c) where third party involvement is mandatory, the need for the manufacturer to have a choice between quality assurance and product certification modules as set out in Annex I;
  • This is usually due to missing information that is required in order for the manufacturer to identify the individual vehicles, more precisely the identification code composed of the type, variant and version of the vehicles concerned.
  • This undertaking must include an obligation for the manufacturer to notify the competent authorities of the following incidents immediately on learning of them:

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!

×

⚡️ Black Friday 2024 ⚡️

Stock up on credits for the entire year!

Grab this offer now!