TextRanch
The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

TextRanch Editors

Olden and Jackson, 2002 vs Olden and Jackson

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Olden and Jackson, 2002" is used when referring to a specific publication or work by Olden and Jackson in the year 2002. On the other hand, "Olden and Jackson" is used when referring to the authors in a general sense without specifying a particular publication or year.

Last updated: March 17, 2024 • 590 views

This phrase is correct when referring to a specific publication or work by Olden and Jackson in the year 2002.

"Olden and Jackson, 2002"

Use this phrase when citing a specific publication or work by Olden and Jackson from the year 2002.

Examples:

  • According to the study by Olden and Jackson, 2002, the results were inconclusive.
  • The findings presented in Olden and Jackson, 2002, shed light on the topic.
  • The book 'Research Methods' by Olden and Jackson, 2002, is a valuable resource.
  • In the paper 'Environmental Trends' by Olden and Jackson, 2002, the authors discuss climate change.
  • The study 'Water Quality Analysis' by Olden and Jackson, 2002, provides important insights.
  • ... to as a 'black box' because it provided little explanatory insight into the relative influence of variables in the prediction process (Olden and Jackson, 2002).
  • significance. Olden and Jackson (2002) introduced a randomization method for statistically assessing the importance of an input based on the comparison of.
  • may be the most critical (Olden and Jackson 2002). Detection is defined as the probability of detecting at least one individual of a species, assuming that the.
  • 2002; Olden and Jackson, 2002; Mu˜noz and Fellicısimo, 2004;. Moisen et al., this issue) is emphasized again here by the fre- quency with which complex ...

Alternatives:

  • Olden and Jackson's work from 2002
  • Olden and Jackson's publication in 2002
  • Olden and Jackson's study in 2002
  • Olden and Jackson's research from 2002
  • Olden and Jackson's book from 2002

This phrase is correct when referring to the authors Olden and Jackson in a general sense without specifying a particular publication or year.

"Olden and Jackson"

Use this phrase when discussing the work or ideas of Olden and Jackson without focusing on a specific publication or year.

Examples:

  • Olden and Jackson have made significant contributions to the field of ecology.
  • The theories proposed by Olden and Jackson are widely accepted.
  • Researchers often cite the work of Olden and Jackson in their studies.
  • Olden and Jackson's research on biodiversity is well-regarded.
  • The collaboration between Olden and Jackson has led to important discoveries.
  • Olden and Jackson, 2001; Joy and Death, 2004;. Vander Zanden et al., 2004; are just a few examples). In these studies, and many others in the literature,.
  • 1999; Olden and Jackson, 2001; Scardi, 2001), and has led many researchers to advocate ANNs as an attractive, non-linear alternative to traditional statistical ...
  • (Olden and Jackson, 2002) have reviewed a number of methods (Neural. Interpretation Diagram, Garson's algorithm and sensitivity analysis) and demonstrated ...
  • Jun 2, 2008 ... tional, parametric approaches (Guisan and. Zimmermann 2000; Peterson and Vieglais. 2001; Olden and Jackson 2002a; Elith et al. 2006).

Alternatives:

  • the authors Olden and Jackson
  • Olden and Jackson's work
  • Olden and Jackson's research
  • Olden and Jackson's contributions
  • Olden and Jackson's findings

Related Comparisons

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

  • Emails and short texts
  • Proofreading & editing
  • Ready in 5-10 minutes
SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

  • Documents of any type (*.docx)
  • Advanced & Premium editing
  • Ready in as little as 4 hours
UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

  • Personalized answers to your language questions
  • Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
  • Ready in 24 hours
ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Powered By Humans

TextRanch Editors

AI is a great tool, but when it comes to perfecting your writing, we rely on real human editors.

  • All our editors are native English speakers.
  • Each editor has passed a rigorous admission test to ensure quality.
  • Our global team is ready to correct any text, anytime.

MEET OUR EDITORS

TextRanch Editors

Why choose TextRanch?

Complete Privacy

Your texts are safe and secure with us. We never share your information with third parties.

Affordable Pricing

No subscription fees and rates up to 50% cheaper than other online editing services.

100% Satisfaction

We guarantee that you'll be satisfied with the quality of our service or your money back.

Top Customer Service

Our team is here to help you with any questions you may have. Contact us anytime.

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

People Feedback 4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Profile picture of Zubair from Bangladesh

Zubair
from Bangladesh From

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Profile picture of Arturo from Mexico

Arturo
from Mexico From

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Profile picture of Selena from USA

Selena
from USA From

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Profile picture of Ifiok from Nigeria

Ifiok
from Nigeria From

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Profile picture of Wilson from France

Wilson
from France From

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Profile picture of Susan from Germany

Susan
from Germany From

Trusted by Hundreds Teams

Facebook logo
Accenture logo
Air Asia logo
AirBus logo
Amazon logo
Bayer logo
Decathlon logo
Docusign logo
Ebay logo
Fiverr logo
Fossil logo
Keller Williams logo
LinkedIn logo
Loreal logo
Motorola logo
Orange logo
Roche logo
Salesforce logo
Stellantis logo