Which one is correct?
"of which two were new" or "whereof two were new"?

of which two were new

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to specify a number of items within a group.

This phrase is used to introduce additional information about a specific subset of a group. It is often used in formal or academic writing.

Alternatives:

  • among which two were new
  • including two that were new

whereof two were new

This phrase is correct but less commonly used in modern English. It has a more formal or archaic tone compared to 'of which two were new'.

This phrase is used to specify a number of items within a group, particularly in formal or literary contexts.

Alternatives:

  • of which two were new
  • among which two were new
  • including two that were new
Both phrases are correct, but 'of which two were new' is more commonly used in modern English. They both serve the same purpose of indicating a specific number of items within a group.

Last Updated: March 23, 2024

TextRanch: The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

Related Comparisons

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!