of which two were new vs whereof two were new

Both phrases are correct, but 'of which two were new' is more commonly used in modern English. They both serve the same purpose of indicating a specific number of items within a group.

Last updated: March 23, 2024 • 818 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to specify a number of items within a group.

"of which two were new"

This phrase is used to introduce additional information about a specific subset of a group. It is often used in formal or academic writing.

Show examples from the web [+]

I just signed two new super-sized clients.
I just signed two new super-sized clients.
Every new thing creates two new questions and two new opportunities.
We have to choose between new cameras and two new nurses.
My bike needs a new chain and two new tyres.
Mr President, with this new year two new countries have joined the Euro zone and adopted our single currency.
This primate had two new evolutionary features.
Tonight we have two new pilgrims joining us.
Look at us - two new parents out on the town.
Two new rights are added, in accordance with that opinion.
These two new sweeteners were authorised by the Scientific Committee on Food during the year 2000.
In addition, Switzerland is building two new large-capacity trans-Alpine railway axes.
9 years later on October 31, 2005, two new victims were found.
Two new members of our First Generation.
We're very happy to have two new members today.
I understand I have two new enemies.
What I'm proposing is we add two new members.
We hire two new techies to reconfigure Medinationals servers.
I need to run a check on two New York Metro enterprises...
Ronnie, we got two new customers.

Alternatives:

among which two were new
including two that were new

This phrase is correct but less commonly used in modern English. It has a more formal or archaic tone compared to 'of which two were new'.

"whereof two were new"

This phrase is used to specify a number of items within a group, particularly in formal or literary contexts.

Show examples from the web [+]

Of the 28 miners, 24 were New Zealanders, two were Australian, two British and one South African.
Her family says you two were close.
Jasper said only two were traveling.
And we understand you two were recently separated.
I understand that you two were intimate.
Her family were new in town.
Ruby said you two were on your way to Cumberland County.
I'd be fine if these two were gone.
These two were just going to the pub.
Looks like you two were having some serious international relations.
I thought you two were looking for Sarah together.
I learned that the last two weren't exactly true.
Looks like you two were close once.
The other two were big ballads.
I realize now that you two were only trying to protect me.
I know you two were having an affair.
I thought you two were cool, man.
While you two were gone, we made some improvements.
I didn't know you two were talking again.
It seems that you two were mixed together without really knowing why.

Alternatives:

of which two were new
among which two were new
including two that were new

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

Emails and short texts
Proofreading & editing
Ready in 5-10 minutes

SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

Documents of any type (*.docx)
Advanced & Premium editing
Ready in as little as 4 hours

UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

Personalized answers to your language questions
Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
Ready in 24 hours

ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

3. Receive Your Polished Text

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Why choose TextRanch?

Complete Privacy

Your texts are safe and secure with us. We never share your information with third parties.

Affordable Pricing

No subscription fees and rates up to 50% cheaper than other online editing services.

100% Satisfaction

We guarantee that you'll be satisfied with the quality of our service or your money back.

Top Customer Service

Our team is here to help you with any questions you may have. Contact us anytime.

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Zubair
from Bangladesh

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Arturo
from Mexico

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Selena
from USA

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Ifiok
from Nigeria

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Wilson
from France

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Susan
from Germany

of which two were new vs whereof two were new