"of the offense described" vs "for the offense described"

Question

"of the offense described" vs "for the offense described"

Both "of the offense described" and "for the offense described" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Of the offense described" is used when referring to a specific offense that has been described, while "for the offense described" is used when indicating the reason or purpose related to the offense that has been described.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

This phrase is used when referring to a specific offense that has been described. It indicates possession or association with the offense.

Examples:

The punishment for the defendant was based on the severity of the offense described.
The details of the offense described in the report were shocking.

Alternatives:

related to the offense described
associated with the offense described
pertaining to the offense described
in relation to the offense described
concerning the offense described

This phrase is used when indicating the reason or purpose related to the offense that has been described. It suggests a connection between the described offense and a consequence or action.

Examples:

The defendant received a harsh penalty for the offense described in the court documents.
The investigation focused on finding evidence for the offense described in the complaint.

Alternatives:

due to the offense described
because of the offense described
in response to the offense described
as a result of the offense described
in relation to the offense described

Answer 1

of the offense described

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

for the offense described

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"of the offense described" vs "for the offense described"

of the offense described

for the offense described

Related Comparisons