"objects as part of" vs "objects for part of"

Question

"objects as part of" vs "objects for part of"

Both phrases are correct, but they have different meanings and contexts. 'Objects for part of' implies that the objects are intended to be used as a component of something, while 'objects as part of' suggests that the objects are included within a larger whole.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

This phrase is used when describing objects that are part of a larger entity or group.

Examples:

The paintings were displayed as part of the art exhibition.
The students were treated as part of the school community.

Alternatives:

objects included as part of
objects forming part of

This phrase is used when referring to objects that are meant to be utilized as a part of a whole or a specific purpose.

Examples:

These tools are objects for part of the assembly process.
The materials are objects for part of the experiment.

Alternatives:

objects intended for part of
objects designed for part of

Answer 1

objects as part of

This phrase is correct and indicates that the objects are included within a larger whole.

Answer 2

objects for part of

This phrase is correct and implies that the objects are intended to be used as a component of something.

"objects as part of" vs "objects for part of"

objects as part of

objects for part of

Related Comparisons