"not entitled to" vs "not have the right to"

Question

"not entitled to" vs "not have the right to"

Both "not entitled to" and "not have the right to" are correct phrases that can be used interchangeably. They both convey the idea that someone does not possess the privilege or permission to do something.

Last Updated: March 21, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate that someone does not have the right or permission to do something.

Alternatives:

not authorized to
not permitted to
not qualified to

This phrase is used to convey the idea that someone lacks the privilege or permission to do something.

Alternatives:

not allowed to
not permitted to
not authorized to

Answer 1

not entitled to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

not have the right to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"not entitled to" vs "not have the right to"

not entitled to

not have the right to

Related Comparisons