Which is correct:
"none has been" or "none have been"?

TextRanch: The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

100% Human-Powered Editing!

none has been

This phrase is correct when referring to a singular entity or action.

Use "none has been" when talking about a single entity or action that has not occurred.

Examples:

  • None has been able to solve the puzzle.
  • None has been more dedicated than she has.

Alternatives:

  • No one has been
  • Nothing has been

none have been

This phrase is correct when referring to multiple entities or actions.

Use "none have been" when talking about multiple entities or actions that have not occurred.

Examples:

  • None have been able to find the missing keys.
  • None have been as successful as they hoped.

Alternatives:

  • No one has been
  • Nothing has been
Both "none has been" and "none have been" are commonly used in English, but the choice between them depends on the context. "None has been" is used when referring to a singular entity or action, while "none have been" is used when referring to multiple entities or actions.

Last updated: March 28, 2024

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!