nodes have associated weights vs have associated weights

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Nodes have associated weights" is used when specifically referring to nodes in a system or network that possess weights. On the other hand, "have associated weights" can be used in a more general context without specifying the subject of the association.

Last updated: March 19, 2024

nodes have associated weights

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to nodes in a system or network that possess weights.

This phrase is used in the context of systems or networks where nodes are assigned weights. It specifies that the nodes are the ones with associated weights.

Examples:

In a neural network, nodes have associated weights that determine their impact on the output.
The graph algorithm assigns nodes with associated weights based on certain criteria.

Alternatives:

Edges have associated weights
Vertices have associated weights
The nodes are associated with weights
Weights are associated with nodes
Nodes possess weights

have associated weights

This phrase is correct and can be used in a more general context without specifying the subject of the association.

This phrase can be used in a general sense to indicate that something is connected or related to weights without specifying the specific entities involved.

Examples:

The data points have associated weights for the analysis.
The items in the list have associated weights that determine their importance.

Alternatives:

Are associated with weights
Possess associated weights
Carry associated weights
Come with associated weights
Include associated weights

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9).

"Thank you!"
Sachi Nakama July 2024
"I have literally been through chat, PI, claude, bard and bing and I got conflicting answers! Thank you! Human intelligence reigns!"
Retha July 2024
"Faster than AI"
CYNTHIA December 2023
"This was very helpful and I personally think this site is the best."
Kaden October 2023
"It was extremely thorough and very helpful!"
imperialelisa October 2023
"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"
Zubair Alam October 2023
"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."
Selena October 2023
"Without textranch I would be stuck!"
宏祐 October 2023
"Accuracy and fast response. Personal comments from editor. Thank you."
Clh September 2023
"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"
Arturo September 2023
"The fact that you can get reliable fast feedback on your texts."
Vinicius Antonio August 2023
"you guys are better than grammarly i'm being honest here"
ordinary July 2023
"OMG! This is really good than any other text correction tools I've used so far. Highly recommend this."
Vehan July 2023
"Very fast and accurate. thank you."
mojtaba July 2023
"I love this app because it's help to writing skills all of students ♥️"
Tarisini July 2023
"This was exactly the mistake I was looking for, the wording dind´t sound right at first. Better than grammarly!"
Ente July 2023
"The immediate help that I received was reassuring and very satisfactory. Thanks."
priiiyanshuu July 2023
"this helps A LOT for my studies."
kathnunez02 June 2023
"Woow!! I would never have expected such precision! Thank you soooo much!!"
Berta June 2023
"Real Time Editor and not AI. Many Thanks."
Priya June 2023
"The very first thing excites me about Textranch is how much your editors care."
sepideh June 2023
"The fact that texts are checked by human editors rather than by AI, etc. I appreciate this!"
Анна June 2023
"Feel welcome, immediate response, high quality feedback"
martin.roy June 2023
"This is the best app that I have ever seen"
Burulai May 2023

nodes have associated weights vs have associated weights