"no exception to" vs "no exception for"

Question

"no exception to" vs "no exception for"

Both "no exception to" and "no exception for" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "No exception to" is used to indicate that something applies universally without any exceptions, while "no exception for" is used to indicate that there are no allowances or special cases.

Last Updated: March 23, 2024

This phrase is used to emphasize that a rule, principle, or statement applies without any exceptions or special cases.

Examples:

There is no exception to the rule that all students must wear uniforms.
The law applies with no exception to all citizens.
The policy is clear with no exception to its implementation.
The company has a strict policy with no exception to its dress code.
The guidelines are strict with no exception to their enforcement.

Alternatives:

no deviation from
no departure from
no variation from
no exemption from
no escape from

This phrase is used to indicate that there are no exceptions or special treatment for a particular situation or group.

Examples:

There is no exception for late submissions in this class.
The policy has no exception for employees who violate the code of conduct.
The law has no exception for those who break the speed limit.
The company has a strict policy with no exception for tardiness.
The rules have no exception for those who fail to follow them.

Alternatives:

no leniency for
no special treatment for
no allowance for
no pardon for
no immunity for

Answer 1

no exception to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate that something applies universally without any exceptions.

Answer 2

no exception for

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate that there are no allowances or special cases.

"no exception to" vs "no exception for"

no exception to

no exception for

Related Comparisons