Which one is correct?
"no damage" or "no damages"?

Question

Which one is correct?
"no damage" or "no damages"?

TextRanch: The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

One of our experts will correct your English.

100% Human-Powered Editing!

This phrase is used when referring to a singular lack of harm or injury. It is often used in everyday language to indicate that something has not been harmed or affected.

Examples:

There was no damage to the car after the accident.
The storm caused no damage to the house.
The package arrived with no damage.
The painting was carefully wrapped to ensure no damage during transport.
The phone screen is scratch-resistant, so it is resistant to damage.

Alternatives:

undamaged
unharmed
intact
unscathed
unaffected

This phrase is used in legal contexts to refer to compensation or financial reparation. It is often seen in legal documents, contracts, or discussions related to financial claims.

Examples:

The court ruled that the plaintiff was entitled to no damages.
The insurance company agreed to pay no damages for the claim.
The contract stipulated that in case of breach, no damages would be awarded.
The settlement agreement included a clause stating no damages could be sought.
The defendant's actions resulted in no damages being awarded.

Alternatives:

no compensation
no financial reparation
no indemnity
no restitution
no redress

Both 'no damage' and 'no damages' are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'No damage' is used when referring to a singular lack of harm or injury, while 'no damages' is used in legal contexts to refer to compensation or financial reparation.

Last Updated: March 31, 2024