Which one is correct?
"no cost increase" or "no-cost increase"?

Question

Which one is correct?
"no cost increase" or "no-cost increase"?

TextRanch: The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

One of our experts will correct your English.

100% Human-Powered Editing!

This phrase is used to highlight that there is no increase in cost associated with a particular situation or scenario. It stresses the lack of additional expenses.

Examples:

There will be no cost increase for the upcoming year's membership.
The company promised no cost increase for its services this quarter.
The budget proposal includes no cost increase for essential programs.
The contract guarantees no cost increase for the first two years.
The policy ensures no cost increase for existing customers.

Alternatives:

zero cost increase
absence of cost increase
increase without cost
cost stability
unchanged cost

This phrase is used to describe an increase that comes without any additional cost. It emphasizes that the increase is provided at no extra charge.

Examples:

The company announced a no-cost increase in benefits for its employees.
The software update includes a no-cost increase in storage capacity.
Customers will enjoy a no-cost increase in their subscription services.
The airline offers a no-cost increase in legroom for premium passengers.
The promotion comes with a no-cost increase in the number of features.

Alternatives:

free increase
complimentary increase
cost-free increase
increase at no cost
increase without charge

Both "no-cost increase" and "no cost increase" can be correct depending on the context. "No-cost increase" is used when referring to an increase that does not incur any cost, while "no cost increase" is used when emphasizing the absence of an increase in cost.

Last Updated: March 27, 2024