TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

No conjunction needed. vs No conjunction is needed

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'No conjunction needed' is a more concise and informal way of expressing the idea, while 'No conjunction is needed' is a more formal and complete sentence. The choice between them depends on the level of formality you want to convey.

Last updated: March 15, 2024 • 1053 views

No conjunction needed.

This phrase is correct and commonly used in informal contexts.

This phrase is a concise way to express that a conjunction is not required. It is commonly used in informal speech or writing.

Examples:

  • No conjunction needed in this sentence.
  • The two ideas flow well together, no conjunction needed.
  • You can list the items without a conjunction needed.
  • She writes clearly, no conjunction needed.
  • The sentence stands alone, no conjunction needed.
  • Mar 6, 2014 ... ... it might be safer for you to use semicolons (instead of colons) or write each of them as two sentences instead (no conjunction needed).

Alternatives:

  • No conjunction is needed.
  • There is no need for a conjunction.
  • A conjunction is unnecessary.
  • You don't need a conjunction.
  • Conjunctions are not required.

No conjunction is needed

This phrase is correct and more formal than the alternative.

This phrase is a complete sentence that states the absence of a need for a conjunction. It is more formal and suitable for written communication.

Examples:

  • In this case, no conjunction is needed.
  • No conjunction is needed to connect these two clauses.
  • The sentence is clear on its own, no conjunction is needed.
  • No conjunction is needed to make the point.
  • The list stands alone, no conjunction is needed.
  • no conjunction is needed to signal it. Such participle clauses are usually rather formal. (You earn Moodle Gold as you answer the quiz questions at the end of ...
  • May 13, 2014 ... No conjunction is needed to link adjectives (an example will come up in lesson 4 in the phrase ... fer coṁthrén coṁchrotha coṁchliss ...
  • Chinese, however, no conjunction is needed to express this logic "ftQ* (=if)." Therefore, when sentence (1) is translated into English or. Japanese, a conjunction ...
  • Sometimes improperly used to introduce a relative clause where no conjunction is needed or admissible; as, " A good man and to whose untiring energy," etc., ...

Alternatives:

  • No conjunction needed.
  • There is no need for a conjunction.
  • A conjunction is unnecessary.
  • You don't need a conjunction.
  • Conjunctions are not required.

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!