"needs to be detailed" vs "needs to be well detailed"

Question

"needs to be detailed" vs "needs to be well detailed"

Both phrases are correct, but they convey slightly different levels of detail. 'Needs to be well detailed' emphasizes a higher level of detail than 'needs to be detailed.' The choice between them depends on the specific context and the desired level of detail.

Last Updated: March 23, 2024

This phrase is used when indicating the requirement for specific information or explanations without emphasizing an exhaustive level of detail.

Examples:

The proposal needs to be detailed to address all aspects of the project.
The job description needs to be detailed to attract qualified candidates.

Alternatives:

needs to be specific
needs to be thorough
needs to be comprehensive
needs to be exhaustive
needs to be elaborate

This phrase is used when emphasizing a thorough and comprehensive level of detail in a description, plan, or document.

Examples:

The report needs to be well detailed to provide a clear understanding of the project.
The instructions for the experiment need to be well detailed to ensure accurate results.

Alternatives:

needs to be detailed and comprehensive
needs to be thoroughly detailed
needs to be meticulously detailed
needs to be extensively detailed
needs to be intricately detailed

Answer 1

needs to be detailed

This phrase is correct and conveys the need for a level of detail without emphasizing an exceptionally high level of detail.

Answer 2

needs to be well detailed

This phrase is correct and emphasizes a higher level of detail.

"needs to be detailed" vs "needs to be well detailed"

needs to be detailed

needs to be well detailed

Related Comparisons