🎁 A holiday package to celebrate the season! Click here and shop now!

TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

must be review vs must be reviewed

The correct phrase is 'must be reviewed.' 'Reviewed' is the past participle form of the verb 'review,' which is needed in this context to form the passive voice. 'Must be review' is incorrect because 'review' should be in the past participle form to convey the intended meaning.

Last updated: March 29, 2024 • 2016 views

must be review

'Must be review' is incorrect. The verb 'review' should be in the past participle form 'reviewed' to convey the passive voice correctly.

The correct phrase is 'must be reviewed,' where 'reviewed' is the past participle form of the verb 'review.' This construction is used to indicate that something needs to undergo a review process.
  • There must be a review of the negative impact of the administrative burden on beneficiaries.
  • There must be a review of the nuclear safety regulatory system as well.
  • In the very short term there must be a review of the directive for the incinerators with new standards for emissions.
  • It must be kept under review as our common policies develop over time.
  • So, if the unacceptable occurs, we must be prepared to review the legislation.
  • These strategies must be subject to annual review and ensure consistency between the various Community policies involved.
  • Authorisations for use of additives must be subject to rolling review.
  • A mid-term review must be carried out of the proposed changes to the Regulation.
  • Also, the situation must be kept under constant review.
  • To be effective, however, this review must be carried out simultaneously at international level.
  • the mapping process to business lines must be subject to independent review.
  • It further requires that all on-going operations must be subject to regular review in order to confirm their continued justification.
  • Whereas in other cases national provisions must be maintained and a review clause applied;
  • Yet, MEPs stress that authors' freedom of choice and intellectual property rights need to be respected and quality peer review must be ensured.
  • As a group, we also consider that there must also be a critical review of the fisheries agreement.
  • However, it is clear that limit values for carcinogens must be kept under constant review.
  • The introduction of EU-wide measures must be considered during the review of this Directive.
  • In all cases where these standards are exceeded there must be a review of the implementation of the methods for monitoring and checking critical points applied in the processing establishment pursuant to Article 14 of this Directive.
  • Europol and Eurojust must be required to review regularly the databases available and to delete information which is no longer relevant to ongoing investigations.
  • The review must be undertaken by the European Parliament in cooperation with the Ombudsman's office and I hope that we can get review under way quite soon.

Alternatives:

  • needs to be reviewed
  • should be reviewed
  • has to be reviewed
  • is to be reviewed
  • ought to be reviewed

must be reviewed

'Must be reviewed' is the correct phrase. The verb 'reviewed' is in the past participle form, which is necessary to convey the passive voice correctly.

This phrase is used to indicate that something is required to undergo a review process. The passive voice is formed by using 'must be' followed by the past participle 'reviewed.'
  • Secondary data not derived from recommended sources must be reviewed by committee.
  • It is therefore obvious that the concrete measures which were decided must be reviewed.
  • Last but not least the pay and benefits package must be reviewed.
  • Firstly, the type of funding must be reviewed, with a look at public-private partnerships and contributions from Member States, which are very erratic at the moment.
  • The non-vaccination policy is therefore based on false scenarios and must be reviewed.
  • Obviously, the directive on collective redundancy procedure must be reviewed and measures which afford greater protection for workers and for jobs must be included in it.
  • Such deviations must be reviewed at intervals not exceeding 5 years.
  • Appropriate measures must be reviewed in the [Joint Council] every [X] months.
  • In a European Union with 500 million inhabitants spread over the whole continent, all European initiatives must be reviewed.
  • These death sentences must not be allowed to be carried out; the verdicts must be reviewed on the basis of a fair trial.
  • Certain forms of intervention must be reviewed, such as those relating to the fight against social exclusion, to social, environmental and fiscal matters and to agricultural policy.
  • Member States' rural development plans must be reviewed as quickly as possible so that the amounts now specified can be made available as soon as possible.
  • In addition to these measures, the very aims of the multilateral trading system must be reviewed with a view to ensuring consistency with the other international organisations.
  • the comitology process must be reviewed so as to ensure that the social partners can participate in committees regarding areas where a particular role is conferred on them by the Treaties;
  • The security policy must be reviewed by implementing a smart, state-of-the-art security system for Parliament, using measures inside buildings and access control procedures, as well as in the area of the EU institutions.
  • It is against this background that the two directives must be reviewed.
  • Authorisation for the use of additives must be reviewed continually.
  • In order to cope with these changes, the WTO must be reviewed.
  • The rules must be reviewed by the end of 2007.
  • The other issues you raised must be reviewed in the context of this regulation.

Alternatives:

  • needs to be reviewed
  • should be reviewed
  • has to be reviewed
  • is to be reviewed
  • ought to be reviewed

Related Comparisons

must be re-design vs must be re-designed Must be always vs Must always be needs to be review vs needs to be reviewed must be uniqued vs must be unique must be designed vs must be design

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!

×

💝 TextRanch Holidays Offer! 💝️

25% special discount
Stock up on credits for the entire year!

Grab this offer now!