"little trace of blood" vs "much trace of cocaine"

Question

"little trace of blood" vs "much trace of cocaine"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Much trace of cocaine' is correct when referring to a significant amount of cocaine residue, while 'little trace of blood' is correct when indicating a small amount of blood residue.

Last Updated: March 21, 2024

This phrase is used to describe a small or insignificant amount of blood residue found in a particular place or on a surface.

Examples:

There was little trace of blood at the crime scene.
The forensic team found little trace of blood on the victim's clothing.

Alternatives:

a small amount of blood residue
a minor presence of blood traces
a negligible quantity of blood remnants
a faint trace of blood
a minimal amount of blood residue

This phrase is used to describe a large or significant amount of cocaine residue found in a particular place or on a surface.

Examples:

There was a much trace of cocaine found in the suspect's car.
The police discovered a much trace of cocaine in the abandoned building.

Alternatives:

a significant amount of cocaine residue
a large quantity of cocaine traces
a substantial presence of cocaine residue
a considerable amount of cocaine remnants
an extensive trace of cocaine

Answer 1

little trace of blood

This phrase is correct and is used to indicate a small amount of blood residue.

Answer 2

much trace of cocaine

This phrase is correct and can be used when referring to a significant amount of cocaine residue.

"little trace of blood" vs "much trace of cocaine"

little trace of blood

much trace of cocaine

Related Comparisons