"most of the city" vs "much of the city"

Question

"most of the city" vs "much of the city"

Both 'much of the city' and 'most of the city' are correct phrases, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'Much of the city' implies a large portion but not necessarily the majority, while 'most of the city' specifically refers to the majority of the city.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

This phrase is used when you want to emphasize that more than half of the city is involved or affected. It indicates a clear majority.

Examples:

Most of the city's residents enjoy the local parks.
The new development project will cover most of the city.
Most of the city is accessible by public transportation.
The festival attracted most of the city's population.
Most of the city's landmarks are located downtown.

Alternatives:

the majority of the city
the greater part of the city
the bulk of the city
the lion's share of the city
the preponderance of the city

This phrase is used to indicate a large but unspecified portion of a city. It suggests a considerable amount without specifying an exact percentage.

Examples:

Much of the city was affected by the heavy rainfall.
She explored much of the city during her visit.
The new park covers much of the city's downtown area.
The museum showcases much of the city's history.
Residents from much of the city attended the event.

Alternatives:

a large part of the city
a significant portion of the city
a considerable area of the city
a substantial amount of the city
a good portion of the city

Answer 1

most of the city

This phrase is correct and specifically refers to the majority of a city.

Answer 2

much of the city

This phrase is correct and commonly used to refer to a significant portion of a city.

"most of the city" vs "much of the city"

most of the city

much of the city

Related Comparisons