🎁 A holiday package to celebrate the season! Click here and shop now!

TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

minor improvements vs minor improment

The correct phrase is 'minor improvements'. 'Improvements' should be in plural form to match the adjective 'minor'. 'Minor improvement' could also be correct depending on the context, but 'minor improvements' is more commonly used.

Last updated: March 22, 2024 • 789 views

minor improvements

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used to refer to small or slight enhancements or changes made to something.

Examples:

  • We made some minor improvements to the website to enhance user experience.
  • The company implemented a series of minor improvements to increase efficiency.
  • The teacher suggested some minor improvements to the student's essay.
  • The software update included minor improvements to fix bugs.
  • The chef made some minor improvements to the recipe to make it more flavorful.
  • A Works well, few or minor improvements required.
  • Works well, few or minor improvements required
  • Frankly, I would propose two further minor improvements.
  • A Works well, a few minor improvements required
  • The report contained very minor improvements compared with the present agreement, but also retrograde elements such as an extension of the period of validity.
  • Unfortunately, the report by Mr Fernandes makes only a few minor improvements and does not go as far as it should.
  • Notes, however, that this election was organised with some minor improvements as regards democratic standards;
  • whereas there were some minor improvements in the conduct of the 28 September parliamentary elections; whereas, however, the OSCE Election Observation Mission concluded in a preliminary statement that the elections fell short of OSCE commitments for democratic elections,
  • Endorses the OSCE EOM conclusions and findings on the 28 September parliamentary elections in placeplaceBelarus; notes some minor improvements in the conduct of these elections, but regrets that the elections ultimately fell short of OSCE commitments for democratic elections;
  • We have three minor improvements in mind.
  • These days, the new social agenda proposes minor improvements against the background of major shortcomings.
  • The report involves minor improvements of a practical nature.
  • We have been constructively raising the issue of operating conditions with Russian authorities at various levels for more than two years, with only very minor improvements so far.
  • But even I have to admit that, over the process of this last time period for the CAP, there have been some minor improvements.
  • It is unacceptable that, in spite of a few minor improvements, the elections of 28 September 2008 fell short of internationally recognised democratic standards, as confirmed by the OSCE Election Observation Mission.
  • The production capacity of the Union producers increased by 9 % throughout the period considered, mainly due to minor improvements to the production process (i.e. no major investments in new plants or equipment).
  • Some minor improvements could still be achieved under the grant policy, but continuing with the voluntary basis will mean accepting the current weakness of these statistics and ignoring users» need for a legal basis.
  • Minor improvements, such as building quay walls, can be decisive in the success of those modal-shift actions.
  • In spite of certain positive developments and several minor improvements from the previous elections, it is deeply regrettable that the Belarusian authorities fell short of their promises and did not ensure a transparent ballot.

Alternatives:

  • minor enhancement
  • small improvements
  • slight improvements
  • minor changes
  • minor adjustments

minor improment

This phrase is incorrect in English.

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!

×

💝 TextRanch Holidays Offer! 💝️

25% special discount
Stock up on credits for the entire year!

Grab this offer now!