1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

"military intervention in" vs "military intervention for"

Both "military intervention in" and "military intervention for" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Military intervention in" is used to specify the location or country where the military intervention is taking place, while "military intervention for" is used to indicate the purpose or reason for the military intervention.

Last Updated: March 20, 2024

military intervention in

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to specify the location or country where the military intervention is taking place.

Use "military intervention in" when you want to specify the location or country where the military intervention is happening. For example, "The United Nations authorized military intervention in the conflict zone."

Examples:

  • The United States led a military intervention in Iraq.
  • There was a military intervention in the civil war in Syria.
  • The NATO forces conducted a military intervention in Kosovo.
  • The UN approved military intervention in the region.
  • The government called for military intervention in the border area.

Alternatives:

  • military intervention within
  • military intervention at
  • military intervention on
  • military intervention into
  • military intervention across

military intervention for

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate the purpose or reason for the military intervention.

Use "military intervention for" when you want to specify the purpose or reason for the military intervention. For example, "The military intervention was for humanitarian reasons."

Examples:

  • The country requested military intervention for peacekeeping.
  • The decision for military intervention was made for strategic reasons.
  • The UN authorized military intervention for protecting civilians.
  • The military intervention was for stabilizing the region.
  • The government justified military intervention for national security.

Alternatives:

  • military intervention to
  • military intervention with the aim of
  • military intervention in order to
  • military intervention aimed at
  • military intervention designed to

Related Comparisons

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!