TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

might not got enough time for stabalisation vs might have not got enough time for stabalisation

The correct phrase is "might not have got enough time for stabilization." The use of "have" is necessary in this context to form the present perfect tense. The phrase without "have" is incorrect.

Last updated: March 22, 2024 • 689 views

might not got enough time for stabalisation

This phrase is incorrect. The use of "have" is necessary in this context to form the present perfect tense.

The correct phrase is "might not have got enough time for stabilization."
  • We got enough time for two quickies.
  • You got enough time for all that?
  • In this respect, we cannot help but wonder if we have not got enough of these as it is and who will continue to pay for them all.
  • You not got enough room in forest?
  • I... haven't got enough time to spend with him.
  • But it means we've got enough time to make one more short pass.
  • According to my algorithms, that would be enough time for the environment to reset.
  • There's barely enough time for a tale.
  • There's enough time for her to both, Walter.
  • There's not enough time for a full evacuation.
  • That's not enough time for a proper sweep on one of these buildings.
  • I barely have enough time for my own patients.
  • Enough time for Alfred to arrive.
  • Enough time for the cancer to gain significant ground...
  • Leaving enough time for him to be tortured first.
  • Allowing the killer enough time for the corrosives to do their thing.
  • Just enough time for you to learn not to interrupt someone when they're talking.
  • I just don't have enough time for that.
  • Ten minutes may be enough time for you.
  • I assume that's enough time for you to conclude your business.

Alternatives:

  • might not have had enough time for stabilization
  • might not have gotten enough time for stabilization
  • might not have received enough time for stabilization
  • might not have obtained enough time for stabilization
  • might not have acquired enough time for stabilization

might have not got enough time for stabalisation

This phrase is correct. The use of "have" in this context is appropriate for forming the present perfect tense.

This phrase is correctly formed in the present perfect tense.
  • In this respect, we cannot help but wonder if we have not got enough of these as it is and who will continue to pay for them all.
  • We got enough time for two quickies.
  • You got enough time for all that?
  • You not got enough room in forest?
  • I... haven't got enough time to spend with him.
  • But it means we've got enough time to make one more short pass.
  • According to my algorithms, that would be enough time for the environment to reset.
  • There's barely enough time for a tale.
  • There's enough time for her to both, Walter.
  • There's not enough time for a full evacuation.
  • That's not enough time for a proper sweep on one of these buildings.
  • I barely have enough time for my own patients.
  • Enough time for Alfred to arrive.
  • Enough time for the cancer to gain significant ground...
  • Leaving enough time for him to be tortured first.
  • Allowing the killer enough time for the corrosives to do their thing.
  • Just enough time for you to learn not to interrupt someone when they're talking.
  • I just don't have enough time for that.
  • Ten minutes may be enough time for you.
  • I assume that's enough time for you to conclude your business.

Alternatives:

  • might have not had enough time for stabilization
  • might have not gotten enough time for stabilization
  • might have not received enough time for stabilization
  • might have not obtained enough time for stabilization
  • might have not acquired enough time for stabilization

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!