"merge with" vs "merge to"

Question

"merge with" vs "merge to"

Both 'merge to' and 'merge with' are commonly used phrases in English, but they are used in different contexts. 'Merge to' is used when referring to the destination or result of a merger, while 'merge with' is used when talking about the action of combining two entities. Therefore, they are not directly comparable as they serve different purposes.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

Use 'merge with' when you want to describe the action of combining two entities, such as 'Company A will merge with Company B.'

Examples:

The company will merge with its competitor to expand its market share.
The two teams will merge with each other to work on a joint project.
The organizations decided to merge with a larger corporation.

Alternatives:

combine with
unite with
join forces with
come together with
fuse with

Use 'merge to' when you want to indicate the destination or result of a merger, such as 'Company A will merge to form a new entity.'

Examples:

The two companies will merge to create a stronger market presence.
The departments will merge to streamline operations.
The two organizations will merge to increase efficiency.

Alternatives:

combine to
unite to
join to form
come together to
fuse to

Answer 1

merge with

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when referring to the action of combining two entities.

Answer 2

merge to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when referring to the destination or result of a merger.

"merge with" vs "merge to"

merge with

merge to

Related Comparisons