meeting was held with the participation vs meeting was held by the participation

Both phrases are not correct. The preposition 'with' is commonly used to indicate the involvement of people in a meeting, while 'by' is not typically used in this context. The correct phrase would be 'meeting was held with the participation.'

Last updated: March 23, 2024 • 4277 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate that a meeting involved the participation of certain individuals.

"meeting was held with the participation"

This phrase is used to describe a meeting that took place with the involvement of specific individuals or groups.

Show examples from the web [+]

A meeting was held with the Austrian authorities on 27 June 2006.
On 29 June 2006, a meeting was held with the Polish authorities.
A further meeting was held with representatives of the Italian authorities on 18 December 2002.
On 16 April 2002, a ministerial-level cooperation council meeting was held with Russia in Luxembourg.
An initial trialogue meeting was held with the Swedish Presidency and the Commission on 26 April.
On 15 November 2006, a meeting was held with the Councillors and Engineers, who promised to have a warden appointed for next summer.
An initial trialogue meeting was held with the Spanish Presidency of the Council and the Commission on 31 January 2002.
Following those votes, a trialogue meeting was held with the Commission and the Greek Presidency in Strasbourg on 11 February.
On 31 May 2007 a meeting was held with the Commission services. Following this meeting, Belgium submitted additional information by letter dated 6 July 2007.
A meeting was held with the United Kingdom and Gibraltar authorities on 19 October 2000 to discuss Gibraltar's offshore tax schemes, the Qualifying Companies regime and the Exempt Companies regime.
On 6 July 2004 a final meeting was held with the German authorities, following which information was submitted by Germany by letter dated 29 July 2004, registered on the same day.
an initial meeting was held with the traditional opposition on 25 August, in order to establish a national dialogue in an organised and transparent framework.
Since the subject of Alzheimer's disease has been mentioned, I can say that, a few weeks ago, a meeting was held with the leading European researcher in the field of Alzheimer's.
As a result, Morocco dispatched its Minister for Foreign Affairs and Cooperation to New York on 26 October to attend a private meeting with the Security Council after a similar meeting was held with the Secretary-General of the Polisario Front on 19 October.
As the Commission needed some clarification on the information contained in the letter sent by on 15 November 2010, a meeting was held with the Finnish authorities in the Commission premises on 4 April 2011.
Yesterday, a ministerial meeting was, for the first time, held in Brussels with the participation of all 25 Member was, of course, an informal meeting.
A bilateral meeting on this subject was held with the Belgian authorities on 12 December 2003.
The most recent steering committee meeting was held in July 2004.
A meeting was held between the French authorities and the Commission on 19 November 1999.
A tachograph CATP meeting was held on 26 June 2003 where these errors were reviewed and corrections were agreed.

This phrase is not correct in English. The preposition 'by' is not typically used to indicate the involvement of people in a meeting.

"meeting was held by the participation"

Show examples from the web [+]

In 2002, one meeting was held by means of a teleconference and two meetings were held outside Frankfurt: one was hosted by De Nederlandsche Bank in Maastricht and one by the Banque centrale du Luxembourg in Luxembourg.
whereas on 8 April 2008 a hearing on war crimes committed by totalitarian regimes was held by the Commission, with the participation of the Council and a group of Members of the European Parliament,
Ms. Bianco was held by her captor for almost one year.
Christopher reported that he was held by two men.
Yesterday, a ministerial meeting was, for the first time, held in Brussels with the participation of all 25 Member was, of course, an informal meeting.
The most recent steering committee meeting was held in July 2004.
A meeting was held between the French authorities and the Commission on 19 November 1999.
A tachograph CATP meeting was held on 26 June 2003 where these errors were reviewed and corrections were agreed.
The Limburg Government building in Maastricht where the meeting was held.
Its second meeting was held on 20 February 2007.
A tachograph CATP meeting was held on 26 June 2003 where these errors were reviewed and corrections were agreed.
A similar meeting was held on 14 November 2002 between Vice-President Podestà and Commission officials.
The last NEB meeting was held on 4 June 2010.
This meeting was held on 16th March.
This meeting was held on 16 March 2011.
A further trialogue meeting was held on 22 January 2002 where a compromise package covering all outstanding issues was established.
The conciliation meeting was held on 4 June in Luxembourg.
A general meeting was held where candidate countries and, indeed, the Commissioner were present.
A very fruitful follow-up meeting was held on 2 December 2003 in Brussels.
The latest dialogue meeting was held in Hanoi last week, on 11 December.

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

Emails and short texts
Proofreading & editing
Ready in 5-10 minutes

SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

Documents of any type (*.docx)
Advanced & Premium editing
Ready in as little as 4 hours

UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

Personalized answers to your language questions
Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
Ready in 24 hours

ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

3. Receive Your Polished Text

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Zubair
from Bangladesh

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Arturo
from Mexico

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Selena
from USA

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Ifiok
from Nigeria

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Wilson
from France

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Susan
from Germany

meeting was held with the participation vs meeting was held by the participation