"may not have been started" vs "may not have been started yet"

Question

"may not have been started" vs "may not have been started yet"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. "May not have been started yet" implies that the action of starting has not happened up to a certain point in time, while "may not have been started" simply indicates that the action of starting has not occurred without specifying a particular time frame.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

This phrase is used when you want to state that an action has not started without referring to a specific time frame. It is more general in nature.

Examples:

The project may not have been started, so we need to confirm with the team.
The meeting may not have been started, as the key participants are still preparing.

Alternatives:

The project may not have been initiated
The meeting may not have commenced
The work may not have been started
The process may not have been initiated
The task may not have been commenced

This phrase is used when you want to emphasize that an action has not started up to a specific moment in time. It implies a time reference.

Examples:

The project may not have been started yet, so we need to check with the team.
The meeting may not have been started yet, as the key participants are still missing.

Alternatives:

The project may not have been started
The meeting may not have started yet
The work may not have been started yet
The process may not have been started yet
The task may not have been started yet

Answer 1

may not have been started

This phrase is correct and commonly used to indicate that an action has not begun without specifying a particular time frame.

Answer 2

may not have been started yet

This phrase is correct and commonly used to indicate that an action has not begun up to a certain point in time.

"may not have been started" vs "may not have been started yet"

may not have been started

may not have been started yet

Related Comparisons