"marred by controversy" vs "marred by controversies"

Question

"marred by controversy" vs "marred by controversies"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'Marred by controversies' is used when referring to multiple controversies that have affected something, while 'marred by controversy' is used when talking about a single controversial issue. The choice between the two depends on whether you are discussing one specific controversy or multiple controversies.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

This phrase is used when describing a situation, event, or person that has been negatively affected by a specific controversial issue.

Examples:

The film's success was marred by controversy surrounding its portrayal of historical events.
The decision to cut down the trees was marred by controversy among environmentalists.

Alternatives:

tainted by controversy
blemished by controversy
sullied by controversy
besmirched by controversy
affected by controversy

This phrase is used when describing a situation, event, or person that has been negatively affected by multiple controversies.

Examples:

The reputation of the company was marred by controversies surrounding its unethical practices.
The political campaign was marred by controversies over funding sources and personal scandals.

Alternatives:

tainted by controversies
blemished by controversies
sullied by controversies
besmirched by controversies
affected by controversies

Answer 1

marred by controversy

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to a single controversial issue that has affected something.

Answer 2

marred by controversies

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to multiple controversies that have affected something.

"marred by controversy" vs "marred by controversies"

marred by controversy

marred by controversies

Related Comparisons