many studies showed vs a lot studies showed

The phrase 'many studies showed' is correct, while 'a lot studies showed' is incorrect. 'Many studies' is a common phrase used to refer to a large number of research projects, while 'a lot studies' is grammatically incorrect due to the missing article 'of' before 'studies'.

Last updated: March 30, 2024 • 565 views

Correct. 'Many studies showed' is a common phrase used to refer to a significant number of research projects.

"many studies showed"

This phrase is used to introduce findings from multiple research studies. 'Many studies showed' is followed by the results or conclusions of those studies.

Examples:

Many studies showed a positive correlation between exercise and mental health.
Many studies showed that the new drug is effective in treating the disease.
Many studies showed different outcomes when comparing various treatment methods.
Many studies showed conflicting results on the impact of caffeine consumption.
Many studies showed a decrease in pollution levels over the past decade.

Show examples from the web [+]

Animal reproduction studies showed that degarelix caused infertility in male animals.
The study showed that food companies exaggerated typically seven times more than an independent study.
Studies showed that the test method used under that Directive no longer reflected real life driving behaviour in urban traffic.
Reproduction toxicity studies showed reduced gamete maturation in rat and adverse effects on fertilization.
The study showed that Celvapan produced an antibody response that met these criteria.
Reproductive toxicity studies showed no effect of ivabradine on fertility in male and female rats.
Animal studies showed that daptomycin is not absorbed to any significant extent after oral administration.
The study showed that Daronrix containing 15 micrograms of haemagglutinin and the adjuvant produced an antibody response that satisfies these criteria.
The additional studies showed that Caelyx was also more effective than the comparator combinations.
In vitro transport studies showed that sitagliptin is a substrate for p-glycoprotein and OAT3.
The study showed that Focetria produced an antibody response that satisfies these criteria.
Both in vitro and in vivo studies showed no signs of QT prolongation.
Study Showed No Signs Of Scarring In Kenny's Heart.
The histological study showed that 42% of the patient was carrying...
A mass balance study showed that approximately 57% of radiolabelled olanzapine appeared in urine, principally as metabolites.
Toxicokinetic studies showed no interaction of the antibodies with the measured concentrations.
The additional study showed that the oral solution and the tablets were equally effective in preventing rejection.
The studies showed that Stalevo is bioequivalent to the separate tablets.
Limited results from open label studies showed an acceptable response to MMR and varicella.
The problems of double taxation are relatively rare, as our study showed.

Incorrect. 'A lot studies showed' is grammatically incorrect due to the missing article 'of' before 'studies'.

"a lot studies showed"

Show examples from the web [+]

Animal reproduction studies showed that degarelix caused infertility in male animals.
Studies showed that the test method used under that Directive no longer reflected real life driving behaviour in urban traffic.
Reproduction toxicity studies showed reduced gamete maturation in rat and adverse effects on fertilization.
The study showed that Celvapan produced an antibody response that met these criteria.
Reproductive toxicity studies showed no effect of ivabradine on fertility in male and female rats.
Animal studies showed that daptomycin is not absorbed to any significant extent after oral administration.
The study showed that Daronrix containing 15 micrograms of haemagglutinin and the adjuvant produced an antibody response that satisfies these criteria.
The additional studies showed that Caelyx was also more effective than the comparator combinations.
In vitro transport studies showed that sitagliptin is a substrate for p-glycoprotein and OAT3.
The study showed that Focetria produced an antibody response that satisfies these criteria.
Both in vitro and in vivo studies showed no signs of QT prolongation.
Study Showed No Signs Of Scarring In Kenny's Heart.
The histological study showed that 42% of the patient was carrying...
A mass balance study showed that approximately 57% of radiolabelled olanzapine appeared in urine, principally as metabolites.
Toxicokinetic studies showed no interaction of the antibodies with the measured concentrations.
The additional study showed that the oral solution and the tablets were equally effective in preventing rejection.
The studies showed that Stalevo is bioequivalent to the separate tablets.
Limited results from open label studies showed an acceptable response to MMR and varicella.
The problems of double taxation are relatively rare, as our study showed.
The San Antonio study showed no significant difference in one year survival rates.

Alternatives:

A lot of studies showed
Numerous studies showed
Several studies showed
Multiple studies showed
Plenty of studies showed

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

Emails and short texts
Proofreading & editing
Ready in 5-10 minutes

SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

Documents of any type (*.docx)
Advanced & Premium editing
Ready in as little as 4 hours

UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

Personalized answers to your language questions
Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
Ready in 24 hours

ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

3. Receive Your Polished Text

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Zubair
from Bangladesh

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Arturo
from Mexico

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Selena
from USA

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Ifiok
from Nigeria

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Wilson
from France

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Susan
from Germany

many studies showed vs a lot studies showed