"low in fat" vs "low on fat"

Question

"low in fat" vs "low on fat"

Both 'low in fat' and 'low on fat' are correct phrases, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'Low in fat' is more commonly used when describing the fat content of food or products. On the other hand, 'low on fat' can be used more informally to indicate a scarcity of fat in a general sense.

Last Updated: March 22, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate that something has a small amount of fat. It is commonly used in the context of food labels, recipes, and dietary recommendations.

Examples:

This yogurt is low in fat.
Choose foods that are low in fat for a healthier diet.
The salad dressing is low in fat and calories.
The nutrition label shows that the product is low in fat.
She prefers snacks that are low in fat.

Alternatives:

high in fat
rich in fat
full of fat
fat-free
low-fat

This phrase can be used more informally to indicate a lack or scarcity of fat in a general context. It is not as commonly used as 'low in fat.'

Examples:

The meal was surprisingly low on fat.
His diet is low on fat and high in protein.
The recipe is intentionally low on fat.
The restaurant offers options that are low on fat.
She tries to keep her cooking low on fat.

Alternatives:

low-fat
low-fat diet
low-fat foods
low-fat options
low-fat cooking

Answer 1

low in fat

This phrase is correct and commonly used when describing the fat content of food or products.

Answer 2

low on fat

This phrase is correct but less commonly used. It can be used informally to indicate a scarcity of fat in a general sense.

"low in fat" vs "low on fat"

low in fat

low on fat

Related Comparisons