"low accuracy of" vs "low accuracy in"

Question

"low accuracy of" vs "low accuracy in"

Both "low accuracy in" and "low accuracy of" are commonly used phrases in English, but they are used in different contexts. "Low accuracy in" is used when referring to a specific area or field where accuracy is lacking, while "low accuracy of" is used when discussing the overall accuracy of something.

Last Updated: April 01, 2024

This phrase is used when discussing the overall accuracy of something. It indicates the general level of accuracy without specifying a particular area or field.

Examples:

The low accuracy of the data made decision-making difficult.
The low accuracy of the model resulted in flawed predictions.
The low accuracy of the information provided caused confusion.
The low accuracy of the survey raised concerns about its reliability.
The low accuracy of the map led to navigation errors.

Alternatives:

poor accuracy of
lack of accuracy of
inaccuracy of

This phrase is used when referring to a specific area or field where accuracy is lacking. It indicates the location or domain where the accuracy is low.

Examples:

There is low accuracy in the measurements taken by the device.
Low accuracy in the financial projections led to significant losses.
The low accuracy in the weather forecast surprised everyone.
The low accuracy in his statements raised doubts about his credibility.
The low accuracy in the test results indicated a need for recalibration.

Alternatives:

poor accuracy in
lack of accuracy in
inaccurate in

Answer 1

low accuracy of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

low accuracy in

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"low accuracy of" vs "low accuracy in"

low accuracy of

low accuracy in

Related Comparisons