TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

losses accounted for vs losses were accounted for

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Losses accounted for' is used when referring to the losses that were considered or included in a calculation or analysis. 'Losses were accounted for' is used when emphasizing that the losses were taken into consideration or explained. The choice between the two depends on the emphasis and context of the sentence.

Last updated: March 30, 2024

losses accounted for

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used to indicate that losses were considered or included in a calculation or analysis.

Alternatives:

  • losses were taken into account
  • losses were included in
  • losses were factored in
  • losses were considered

losses were accounted for

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used to emphasize that the losses were taken into consideration or explained.

Alternatives:

  • losses were explained
  • losses were justified
  • losses were clarified
  • losses were reconciled

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!